Prevalence of pharmacological control of arterial hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) findings

J. Abreu, Ramón Romano, L. Reyes, Sharon Calderato, Oscar Vasquez, Pedro Peguero, I. Gutiérrez, Yaris Feliz
{"title":"Prevalence of pharmacological control of arterial hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) findings","authors":"J. Abreu, Ramón Romano, L. Reyes, Sharon Calderato, Oscar Vasquez, Pedro Peguero, I. Gutiérrez, Yaris Feliz","doi":"10.21801/ppcrj.2022.84.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Arterial hypertension (AHT) is one of the most prevalent chronic non-transmittable diseases and the main cause of cardiovascular death worldwide (World Health Organization, 2021). Adequate control of blood pressure levels is the best therapeutic measure to manage and prevent hypertension-related complications. In the Dominican Republic, there is insufficient and unreliable data related to pharmacological control through ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM). Methods: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, in which the results of 380 patients, who underwent an ABPM, were analyzed to determine if their blood pressure levels were within therapeutic control. The study was conducted between March 2022 and May 2022. The diagnostic criteria to determine blood pressure control were used from the guidelines of the Specialized Diagnostic Center (CEDISA), and included being older than 18 and having a study duration longer than 18 hours. Likewise, we excluded pregnant patients, patients diagnosed with heart failure, or patients taking triple antihypertensive therapy. For the data summary, we used mean and standard deviation. For statistical testing, we performed a Shapiro-Wilk normality test, and a two-tailed Student's t-test was used to assess the mean difference for which a value of p<0.05 was chosen to demonstrate significance. We performed a Bonferroni correction to adjust the significance value using the mean blood pressure in the repeated measures for the t-test, which reduced the significance from 0.05 to 0.016. Results: The point prevalence of adequate pharmacological control was 44.2% (95% CI 39.21% to 49.19%). The mean systolic blood pressure of controlled patients was 117.8 (±7.5), while that of un-controlled patients was 140.8 (±14.5). Between controlled and uncontrolled patients, the drugs most frequently used for managing hypertension were angiotensin II, receptor antagonists. There is a statistically significant difference between the mean 24-hour and daytime systolic blood pressure between males and females (p. 0.0016 and p. 0.0007, respectively) and 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic blood pressure between controlled and uncontrolled patients (p. 0.000, p. 0.000, p 0.000, respectively) Discussion: The prevalence of adequate pharmacological control in patients suffering from arterial hypertension encompasses 168 patients of the 380 studied, so it is evident that the remaining 212 patients, even when diagnosed, have not managed to obtain controlled blood pressure levels. The study was limited by not being able to investigate the treatment specifications and other risk factors. Regardless of these issues, the study obtained the desired sample size; therefore, it can establish the study’s reported AHT control prevalence as a direct measure of hypertensive patients in the Dominican Republic not being adequately controlled.","PeriodicalId":74496,"journal":{"name":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21801/ppcrj.2022.84.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Arterial hypertension (AHT) is one of the most prevalent chronic non-transmittable diseases and the main cause of cardiovascular death worldwide (World Health Organization, 2021). Adequate control of blood pressure levels is the best therapeutic measure to manage and prevent hypertension-related complications. In the Dominican Republic, there is insufficient and unreliable data related to pharmacological control through ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM). Methods: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, in which the results of 380 patients, who underwent an ABPM, were analyzed to determine if their blood pressure levels were within therapeutic control. The study was conducted between March 2022 and May 2022. The diagnostic criteria to determine blood pressure control were used from the guidelines of the Specialized Diagnostic Center (CEDISA), and included being older than 18 and having a study duration longer than 18 hours. Likewise, we excluded pregnant patients, patients diagnosed with heart failure, or patients taking triple antihypertensive therapy. For the data summary, we used mean and standard deviation. For statistical testing, we performed a Shapiro-Wilk normality test, and a two-tailed Student's t-test was used to assess the mean difference for which a value of p<0.05 was chosen to demonstrate significance. We performed a Bonferroni correction to adjust the significance value using the mean blood pressure in the repeated measures for the t-test, which reduced the significance from 0.05 to 0.016. Results: The point prevalence of adequate pharmacological control was 44.2% (95% CI 39.21% to 49.19%). The mean systolic blood pressure of controlled patients was 117.8 (±7.5), while that of un-controlled patients was 140.8 (±14.5). Between controlled and uncontrolled patients, the drugs most frequently used for managing hypertension were angiotensin II, receptor antagonists. There is a statistically significant difference between the mean 24-hour and daytime systolic blood pressure between males and females (p. 0.0016 and p. 0.0007, respectively) and 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic blood pressure between controlled and uncontrolled patients (p. 0.000, p. 0.000, p 0.000, respectively) Discussion: The prevalence of adequate pharmacological control in patients suffering from arterial hypertension encompasses 168 patients of the 380 studied, so it is evident that the remaining 212 patients, even when diagnosed, have not managed to obtain controlled blood pressure levels. The study was limited by not being able to investigate the treatment specifications and other risk factors. Regardless of these issues, the study obtained the desired sample size; therefore, it can establish the study’s reported AHT control prevalence as a direct measure of hypertensive patients in the Dominican Republic not being adequately controlled.
动态血压测量(ABPM)结果对动脉高压药物控制的患病率
引言:动脉高压(AHT)是最常见的慢性非传染性疾病之一,也是全球心血管死亡的主要原因(世界卫生组织,2021)。充分控制血压水平是管理和预防高血压相关并发症的最佳治疗措施。在多米尼加共和国,通过动态血压测量进行药物控制的数据不足且不可靠。方法:横断面和回顾性研究,分析380名接受ABPM的患者的结果,以确定他们的血压水平是否在治疗控制范围内。该研究于2022年3月至2022年5月期间进行。根据专业诊断中心(CEDISA)的指南,确定血压控制的诊断标准包括年龄超过18岁和研究持续时间超过18小时。同样,我们排除了孕妇、被诊断为心力衰竭的患者或接受三重降压治疗的患者。对于数据汇总,我们使用了平均值和标准差。对于统计检验,我们进行了Shapiro-Wilk正态性检验,并使用双尾Student t检验来评估平均差异,选择p<0.05的值来证明其显著性。我们使用t检验重复测量中的平均血压进行了Bonferroni校正,以调整显著性值,将显著性从0.05降低到0.016。结果:适当药物控制的点患病率为44.2%(95%CI 39.21%至49.19%)。对照组患者的平均收缩压为117.8(±7.5),而非对照组患者为140.8(±14.5)。在对照组和非对照组之间,最常用于治疗高血压的药物是血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂。男性和女性的平均24小时和日间收缩压之间存在统计学显著差异(分别为0.0016和0.0007),以及对照组和非对照组患者之间的夜间收缩压(分别为0.000、0.000和0.000)讨论:在380名研究患者中,充分药物控制的患病率包括168名患者,因此很明显,其余212名患者,即使在诊断时,没有设法获得受控的血压水平。由于无法调查治疗规范和其他风险因素,该研究受到限制。不管这些问题如何,该研究都获得了所需的样本量;因此,它可以将该研究报告的AHT控制率确定为多米尼加共和国高血压患者未得到充分控制的直接指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信