The Qualified Lawyers Transfer Scheme: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) 2014–2022

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Eileen Fry, Richard Wakeford
{"title":"The Qualified Lawyers Transfer Scheme: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) 2014–2022","authors":"Eileen Fry, Richard Wakeford","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2246359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To what extent should law teachers be permitted to advance controversial ethical, moral or political views as part of the LLB curriculum? This short paper grapples with that question by defending the ethical permissibility of such behaviour subject to the important proviso that it does not cause students “pedagogical harm”. In reaching this conclusion, three alternative views are considered and dismissed, each of which seeks either to eliminate value inculcation entirely or to restrict its scope to the moral-political values currently immanent within established law. The approach taken is argumentative, drawing upon analytical philosophy, with each contested and","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"57 1","pages":"377 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2246359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To what extent should law teachers be permitted to advance controversial ethical, moral or political views as part of the LLB curriculum? This short paper grapples with that question by defending the ethical permissibility of such behaviour subject to the important proviso that it does not cause students “pedagogical harm”. In reaching this conclusion, three alternative views are considered and dismissed, each of which seeks either to eliminate value inculcation entirely or to restrict its scope to the moral-political values currently immanent within established law. The approach taken is argumentative, drawing upon analytical philosophy, with each contested and
合格律师转学计划:目标结构化临床考试(OSCE)2014-2012
作为法学学士课程的一部分,法律教师应该在多大程度上被允许提出有争议的伦理、道德或政治观点?这篇短文通过捍卫这种行为的道德允许性来解决这个问题,但前提是它不会对学生造成“教学伤害”。在得出这一结论时,我们考虑并否定了三种不同的观点,每种观点都试图完全消除价值灌输,或者将其范围限制在现行法律中固有的道德政治价值观。所采取的方法是争论性的,借鉴了分析哲学,每种方法都有争议和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信