The prevalence of posterior tongue tie in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
W. Tome, W. Moon
{"title":"The prevalence of posterior tongue tie in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency","authors":"W. Tome, W. Moon","doi":"10.21307/aoj-2021.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives To investigate the prevalence of posterior tongue tie in orthodontic patients using numerical and clinical assessment methods in order to identify an association between posterior tongue tie and transverse maxillary deficiency. Materials and methods Seventy-nine participants from an orthodontic clinic were divided into two groups. The first group of 44 patients exhibited a skeletally narrow maxilla and required maxillary skeletal expansion (MSE group) and 35 patients without a transverse discrepancy comprised a control group. Posterior tongue tie was examined by the Kotlow tongue tie classification, tongue range of motion ratio (TRMR) and via a clinical assessment. The prevalence of posterior tongue tie was compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the level of the Kotlow classification grade between the two groups (p > 0.05) and the overall majority was diagnosed as normal. However, a higher proportion of posterior tongue tie was found in the MSE group than in the control group by clinical assessment (MSE group, 72.7%; control group, 42.9%; p = 0.005). The proportion of TRMR grade 2 was also higher in the MSE group than in the control group (p = 0.001). Of the subjects diagnosed with posterior tongue tie by clinical findings, approximately 94% showed TRMR grades 2 or 3. Conclusions A clinical assessment of posterior tongue tie was found to be simple and accurate, whereas a numerical assessment alone provided diagnostic difficulty. Considering the high prevalence of observed posterior tongue tie in the MSE group, there was a significant association between posterior tongue tie and transverse maxillary deficiency.","PeriodicalId":48559,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"294 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2021.033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To investigate the prevalence of posterior tongue tie in orthodontic patients using numerical and clinical assessment methods in order to identify an association between posterior tongue tie and transverse maxillary deficiency. Materials and methods Seventy-nine participants from an orthodontic clinic were divided into two groups. The first group of 44 patients exhibited a skeletally narrow maxilla and required maxillary skeletal expansion (MSE group) and 35 patients without a transverse discrepancy comprised a control group. Posterior tongue tie was examined by the Kotlow tongue tie classification, tongue range of motion ratio (TRMR) and via a clinical assessment. The prevalence of posterior tongue tie was compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the level of the Kotlow classification grade between the two groups (p > 0.05) and the overall majority was diagnosed as normal. However, a higher proportion of posterior tongue tie was found in the MSE group than in the control group by clinical assessment (MSE group, 72.7%; control group, 42.9%; p = 0.005). The proportion of TRMR grade 2 was also higher in the MSE group than in the control group (p = 0.001). Of the subjects diagnosed with posterior tongue tie by clinical findings, approximately 94% showed TRMR grades 2 or 3. Conclusions A clinical assessment of posterior tongue tie was found to be simple and accurate, whereas a numerical assessment alone provided diagnostic difficulty. Considering the high prevalence of observed posterior tongue tie in the MSE group, there was a significant association between posterior tongue tie and transverse maxillary deficiency.
上颌骨横向缺损患者后舌系带的发生率
摘要目的采用数值和临床评估方法,调查正畸患者后舌系带的患病率,以确定后舌系带与上颌骨横向缺损之间的关系。材料和方法79名来自正畸诊所的参与者被分为两组。第一组44名患者上颌骨狭窄,需要上颌骨扩张(MSE组),35名没有横向差异的患者组成对照组。通过Kotlow舌系带分类、舌活动范围比(TRMR)和临床评估检查后舌系带。比较两组患者后舌系带的患病率。结果两组患者的Kotlow分级水平无显著差异(p>0.05),总体诊断为正常。然而,通过临床评估,MSE组的后舌头打结比例高于对照组(MSE组,72.7%;对照组,42.9%;p=0.005)。MSE组TRMR 2级的比例也高于对照组,(p=0.001)。在通过临床检查诊断为后舌头打结的受试者中,大约94%显示TRMR等级2或3。结论后舌系带的临床评估是简单而准确的,而单独的数字评估提供了诊断困难。考虑到MSE组中观察到的后舌系带的高患病率,后舌系带与上颌骨横向缺损之间存在显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Orthodontic Journal
Australasian Orthodontic Journal Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Australasian Orthodontic Journal (AOJ) is the official scientific publication of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. Previously titled the Australian Orthodontic Journal, the name of the publication was changed in 2017 to provide the region with additional representation because of a substantial increase in the number of submitted overseas'' manuscripts. The volume and issue numbers continue in sequence and only the ISSN numbers have been updated. The AOJ publishes original research papers, clinical reports, book reviews, abstracts from other journals, and other material which is of interest to orthodontists and is in the interest of their continuing education. It is published twice a year in November and May. The AOJ is indexed and abstracted by Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) and Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信