Potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobility

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Laura Hostettler Macias, Emmanuel Ravalet, Patrick Rérat
{"title":"Potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobility","authors":"Laura Hostettler Macias,&nbsp;Emmanuel Ravalet,&nbsp;Patrick Rérat","doi":"10.1111/gec3.12657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The practice of teleworking has been growing steadily in recent years with the development of ICT and the flexibilisation of work. The Covid-19 pandemic and its stay-at-home restrictions have further accelerated this trend. As teleworking reduces the frequency of commuting, it also reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and may be seen as a tool to regulate mobility. However, and especially since working from home enables more flexible working, teleworking may have various ‘rebound‘ effects on daily and residential mobility practices. Rebound effects include possible increases in the frequency or distance of journeys, such as an increase in non-work-related travel on teleworking days, as well as effects such as residential relocation or multilocal dwelling. In this article we intend to introduce and categorize the existing literature on the potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobility. By critically assessing the literature we have identified the major lessons, while also noticing the limits of the research and a scarcity of qualitative approaches to understand how and why people who telework reinvest their non-commuting time in other forms of mobility. Also missing in the literature is the longitudinal aspect, that is, the consideration of long-term changes. These gaps have led us to formulate our proposition of a research agenda, where the lifestyle and life course approaches have emerged as crucial tools to understanding the motivations for teleworking and the respective rebound effects on residential and daily mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12657","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12657","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The practice of teleworking has been growing steadily in recent years with the development of ICT and the flexibilisation of work. The Covid-19 pandemic and its stay-at-home restrictions have further accelerated this trend. As teleworking reduces the frequency of commuting, it also reduces CO2 emissions and may be seen as a tool to regulate mobility. However, and especially since working from home enables more flexible working, teleworking may have various ‘rebound‘ effects on daily and residential mobility practices. Rebound effects include possible increases in the frequency or distance of journeys, such as an increase in non-work-related travel on teleworking days, as well as effects such as residential relocation or multilocal dwelling. In this article we intend to introduce and categorize the existing literature on the potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobility. By critically assessing the literature we have identified the major lessons, while also noticing the limits of the research and a scarcity of qualitative approaches to understand how and why people who telework reinvest their non-commuting time in other forms of mobility. Also missing in the literature is the longitudinal aspect, that is, the consideration of long-term changes. These gaps have led us to formulate our proposition of a research agenda, where the lifestyle and life course approaches have emerged as crucial tools to understanding the motivations for teleworking and the respective rebound effects on residential and daily mobility.

远程办公对居住和日常流动性的潜在反弹效应
近年来,随着信息通信技术的发展和工作的灵活性,远程办公的实践稳步增长。新冠肺炎大流行及其居家限制进一步加速了这一趋势。由于远程办公减少了通勤的频率,它也减少了二氧化碳的排放,可能被视为一种调节流动性的工具。然而,特别是由于在家工作可以更灵活地工作,远程办公可能会对日常和住宅移动实践产生各种“反弹”效应。反弹效应包括旅行频率或距离的可能增加,例如远程工作日与工作无关的旅行增加,以及住宅搬迁或多地居住等影响。在这篇文章中,我们打算介绍和分类现有的关于远程工作对居住和日常流动性的潜在反弹效应的文献。通过批判性地评估文献,我们已经确定了主要的教训,同时也注意到研究的局限性,以及缺乏定性方法来理解远程工作的人如何以及为什么将他们的非通勤时间再投资于其他形式的流动性。文献中还缺少纵向方面,即对长期变化的考虑。这些差距促使我们制定了一项研究议程,其中生活方式和生命历程方法已成为理解远程工作动机以及各自对住宅和日常流动性的反弹效应的关键工具。©2022作者。约翰威利父子有限公司出版的地理指南针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography Compass
Geography Compass GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信