«But don't quote me on that»: how Ukrainian top media characterized the perception of migration and migrants

L. Yuzva, A. Tashchenko
{"title":"«But don't quote me on that»: how Ukrainian top media characterized the perception of migration and migrants","authors":"L. Yuzva, A. Tashchenko","doi":"10.29038/2306-3971-2021-01-58-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ukraine finds itself in the countries of the Global North, which means that it adopts the formulation of its typical research questions like the current migration research landscape. Existing research are heavily skewed towards the Global North, where governments and international organizations increasingly fund them to inform policy development. Thus, migration provides the relevance of the study of discourses around the body of concepts on it. The article describes the subtexts of media characterising the perception of migration by migrants themselves and the perception of migrants by host side. With using the Mediateka tool, an automated sample of 39,000 reports on various groups of migrants was received in the TOP-15 of the Ukrainian media (print media, TV channels, informational online media) from 2015 to 2018. The sample consisted of 12,000 messages, every tenth of which was selected for further in-depth analysis. The research was based on qualitative content analysis and critical discourse analysis. The six steps were done: looking at the description of the migration as objective necessity, subjective aspiration and something meaningless, and looking at the description of migrants as decent people, indecent people and just people with some lifestyle. The latent meanings of the messages, where the leading Ukrainian media touched on the perception of migration and migrants, were divergent and contradictory; they could not become the basis for confidence in any permanent characteristics of the images of migrants. As one of the most interesting prospects for further research, it may be the test of whether those transmitted meanings, which are usually considered positive, can interfere with social integration, and vice versa – whether negative meanings can help it. This can be done on the basis of additional empirical research using quantitative methods, such as cluster analysis to check which groups media consumers might be divided into after receiving the information about migrants.","PeriodicalId":33169,"journal":{"name":"Sotsiologichni studiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sotsiologichni studiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2021-01-58-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ukraine finds itself in the countries of the Global North, which means that it adopts the formulation of its typical research questions like the current migration research landscape. Existing research are heavily skewed towards the Global North, where governments and international organizations increasingly fund them to inform policy development. Thus, migration provides the relevance of the study of discourses around the body of concepts on it. The article describes the subtexts of media characterising the perception of migration by migrants themselves and the perception of migrants by host side. With using the Mediateka tool, an automated sample of 39,000 reports on various groups of migrants was received in the TOP-15 of the Ukrainian media (print media, TV channels, informational online media) from 2015 to 2018. The sample consisted of 12,000 messages, every tenth of which was selected for further in-depth analysis. The research was based on qualitative content analysis and critical discourse analysis. The six steps were done: looking at the description of the migration as objective necessity, subjective aspiration and something meaningless, and looking at the description of migrants as decent people, indecent people and just people with some lifestyle. The latent meanings of the messages, where the leading Ukrainian media touched on the perception of migration and migrants, were divergent and contradictory; they could not become the basis for confidence in any permanent characteristics of the images of migrants. As one of the most interesting prospects for further research, it may be the test of whether those transmitted meanings, which are usually considered positive, can interfere with social integration, and vice versa – whether negative meanings can help it. This can be done on the basis of additional empirical research using quantitative methods, such as cluster analysis to check which groups media consumers might be divided into after receiving the information about migrants.
«但不要引用我的话»:乌克兰顶级媒体如何描述移民和移民的看法
乌克兰发现自己处于全球北方国家,这意味着它采用了其典型研究问题的提法,如当前的移民研究格局。现有的研究严重偏向于全球北方,那里的政府和国际组织越来越多地为其提供资金,为政策制定提供信息。因此,移民提供了围绕移民概念本体的话语研究的相关性。文章描述了媒体的潜台词,描述了移民自身对移民的感知和东道国对移民的认知。使用Mediateka工具,2015年至2018年,乌克兰媒体(平面媒体、电视频道、信息在线媒体)的TOP-15中收到了39000份关于不同移民群体的自动样本报告。样本由12000条信息组成,每十分之一被选中进行进一步深入分析。本研究以定性内容分析和批判性话语分析为基础。完成了六个步骤:将移民描述为客观的必要性、主观的愿望和无意义的东西,将移民描述成正派人、下流人和有某种生活方式的正义人。乌克兰主要媒体在谈到移民和移民的看法时,这些信息的潜在含义是分歧和矛盾的;它们不能成为人们对移民形象的任何永久特征抱有信心的基础。作为进一步研究最有趣的前景之一,这可能是测试那些通常被认为是积极的传递意义是否会干扰社会融合,反之亦然——消极意义是否会帮助社会融合。这可以在使用定量方法进行额外实证研究的基础上进行,例如聚类分析,以检查媒体消费者在接收到关于移民的信息后可能被划分为哪些组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信