Real Estate Tax Reform, Economic Growth and Financial Stability

Chuang Zhou, Min Pan
{"title":"Real Estate Tax Reform, Economic Growth and Financial Stability","authors":"Chuang Zhou, Min Pan","doi":"10.1515/cfer-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract By constructing a multi-sector DSGE model embedded with tax wedge, housing mortgage financing constraints and bank supervision constraints, this paper investigates the long-term impact of two types of real estate tax policies on economic growth and financial stability, which are the unified tax base assessment ratio and differential tax base assessment ratio for two major housing owners (household and enterprises). It also compares and analyzes the short-term impact of the above two types of real estate tax reform schemes on economic fluctuations and financial risks under the background of potential financial risks facing China’s economy. The results show that: in the long run, the real estate tax will help economic growth, boost household consumption, and effectively suppress the excessive increase in household leverage and asset bubble risk through the “suppression effect” of housing prices and the “redistribution effect” on housing. In the short run, the real estate tax will not intensify the impact of systemic financial risks, so it will not have an adverse impact on the maintenance of financial stability. Different real estate tax policies have different impact on economic growth and financial stability. Compared with the real estate tax with unified tax base assessment ratio, the real estate tax with differential tax base assessment ratio is better for the coordinated development of financial activities and the real economy in the long term and play a stronger role in economic growth, which contributes to the unity of “stable growth”, “risk prevention” and “reform”.","PeriodicalId":66259,"journal":{"name":"China Finance and Economic Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"89 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance and Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract By constructing a multi-sector DSGE model embedded with tax wedge, housing mortgage financing constraints and bank supervision constraints, this paper investigates the long-term impact of two types of real estate tax policies on economic growth and financial stability, which are the unified tax base assessment ratio and differential tax base assessment ratio for two major housing owners (household and enterprises). It also compares and analyzes the short-term impact of the above two types of real estate tax reform schemes on economic fluctuations and financial risks under the background of potential financial risks facing China’s economy. The results show that: in the long run, the real estate tax will help economic growth, boost household consumption, and effectively suppress the excessive increase in household leverage and asset bubble risk through the “suppression effect” of housing prices and the “redistribution effect” on housing. In the short run, the real estate tax will not intensify the impact of systemic financial risks, so it will not have an adverse impact on the maintenance of financial stability. Different real estate tax policies have different impact on economic growth and financial stability. Compared with the real estate tax with unified tax base assessment ratio, the real estate tax with differential tax base assessment ratio is better for the coordinated development of financial activities and the real economy in the long term and play a stronger role in economic growth, which contributes to the unity of “stable growth”, “risk prevention” and “reform”.
房地产税改革、经济增长与金融稳定
摘要本文通过构建嵌入税收楔子、住房抵押贷款融资约束和银行监管约束的多部门DSGE模型,研究了两种主要住房所有者(家庭和企业)统一税基评估比例和差异税基评估比例两种房地产税政策对经济增长和金融稳定的长期影响。并在中国经济面临潜在金融风险的背景下,对比分析上述两类房地产税改革方案对经济波动和金融风险的短期影响。研究结果表明:从长期来看,房地产税有利于经济增长,促进居民消费,通过房价的“抑制效应”和住房的“再分配效应”,有效抑制居民杠杆过度增加和资产泡沫风险。从短期来看,房地产税不会加剧系统性金融风险的冲击,因此不会对维护金融稳定产生不利影响。不同的房地产税政策对经济增长和金融稳定的影响是不同的。与统一税基计税比例的房地产税相比,差别计税比例的房地产税更有利于金融活动与实体经济的长期协调发展,对经济增长的促进作用更强,有利于“稳增长”、“防风险”、“改革”的统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信