Public benefits, recognition, and the same old materialist conclusion: a lyric essay

IF 2.3 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
E. Segal
{"title":"Public benefits, recognition, and the same old materialist conclusion: a lyric essay","authors":"E. Segal","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this lyric essay, the author uses auto-ethnographic inquiry to re-contextualize a qualitative study of Latina parents’ experiences of safety net services, benefits, and programs. That study concluded that at the heart of service use was ambivalence about dependency; at the heart of ambivalence about dependency was the desire for recognition. The purpose of this article is to express and explore that finding intersectionally, i.e. in the context of gender, race, and class. The author deliberately avoids narrative coherence, yet relies on Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition as an orienting framework.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this lyric essay, the author uses auto-ethnographic inquiry to re-contextualize a qualitative study of Latina parents’ experiences of safety net services, benefits, and programs. That study concluded that at the heart of service use was ambivalence about dependency; at the heart of ambivalence about dependency was the desire for recognition. The purpose of this article is to express and explore that finding intersectionally, i.e. in the context of gender, race, and class. The author deliberately avoids narrative coherence, yet relies on Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition as an orienting framework.
公众利益,认可,以及同样的唯物主义结论:一篇抒情文章
摘要在这篇抒情文章中,作者使用自动民族志调查,对拉丁裔父母在安全网服务、福利和计划方面的经历进行了定性研究。该研究得出结论,服务使用的核心是对依赖的矛盾心理;对依赖的矛盾心理的核心是对认可的渴望。本文的目的是交叉表达和探索这一发现,即在性别、种族和阶级的背景下。作者有意避免叙事连贯性,但以阿克塞尔·洪内斯的认知理论为指导框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信