Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Antonio Gramsci, and the Myth of Niccolò Machiavelli

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY
Maya Balakirsky Katz
{"title":"Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Antonio Gramsci, and the Myth of Niccolò Machiavelli","authors":"Maya Balakirsky Katz","doi":"10.1080/13501674.2021.1952024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reconsiders the criticism to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion during its initial publication and after its resurgence during the 1917 Russian Revolution. It argues that scholars have overemphasized repudiations of the text’s archaic antisemitism and plagiarism at the expense of critiques focusing on its modernist invective against “media control.” The paper recovers the issue of the Russian Empire’s control of the media, which liberal thinkers identified as central to Protocols in its first three decades of circulation, followed by a consideration of Antonio Gramsci’s interwar theorization of media control as among the most salient efforts to respond to the text. In theoretical threads that would later be picked up by the intellectuals of the Frankfurt School, among others, Gramsci responded to Protocols’ core invective by espousing the need for progressive forces to take control over mass media.","PeriodicalId":42363,"journal":{"name":"East European Jewish Affairs","volume":"51 1","pages":"18 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Jewish Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501674.2021.1952024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reconsiders the criticism to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion during its initial publication and after its resurgence during the 1917 Russian Revolution. It argues that scholars have overemphasized repudiations of the text’s archaic antisemitism and plagiarism at the expense of critiques focusing on its modernist invective against “media control.” The paper recovers the issue of the Russian Empire’s control of the media, which liberal thinkers identified as central to Protocols in its first three decades of circulation, followed by a consideration of Antonio Gramsci’s interwar theorization of media control as among the most salient efforts to respond to the text. In theoretical threads that would later be picked up by the intellectuals of the Frankfurt School, among others, Gramsci responded to Protocols’ core invective by espousing the need for progressive forces to take control over mass media.
锡安长老、葛兰西和马基雅维利神话的协议
摘要本文重新审视了《锡安长老纪要》在出版初期以及在1917年俄国革命期间复兴后受到的批评。它认为,学者们过分强调了对古代反犹主义和剽窃的否定,而忽略了对现代主义对“媒体控制”的谩骂。本文恢复了俄罗斯帝国对媒体的控制问题,自由主义思想家认为在《议定书》发行的前三十年中,这是《议定书》的核心,随后考虑了安东尼奥·葛兰西(Antonio Gramsci)的两次世界大战之间的媒体控制理论,这是对文本的最显著的回应。在后来被法兰克福学派的知识分子和其他人所接受的理论线索中,葛兰西通过支持进步力量控制大众媒体的必要性来回应《议定书》的核心谩骂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信