Antidepressants and the Risk of Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults with Incident Depression in the United States: A Comparative Safety Analysis

A. Tabah, L. Gold, Z. Marcum, R. Hansen
{"title":"Antidepressants and the Risk of Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults with Incident Depression in the United States: A Comparative Safety Analysis","authors":"A. Tabah, L. Gold, Z. Marcum, R. Hansen","doi":"10.3390/pharma2030018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though it is well documented that antidepressants are associated with an increased risk of falls in older adults at the drug class level, the comparative risk between individual antidepressants for fall injury in older adults with depression is unknown. Currently, clinicians are making decisions at the drug class level without consideration of the potential that there could be safer choices within classes. We compared the risk of fall injury among initiators of bupropion, duloxetine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and venlafaxine to those of (es)citalopram and, separately, sertraline. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the MarketScan® Medicare Supplemental claims from 2007 to 2019. Individuals had incident depression (washout in previous continually enrolled year) with a first antidepressant claim up to three months after depression diagnosis. Individuals were followed for the first three months of antidepressant use until the first occurrence of fall injury, change/discontinuation of antidepressant, discontinued insurance coverage, or end of study. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for each antidepressant comparison and fall injury. We identified 114,505 individuals (mean age 76.6 years, 68% female, 97% without prior fall). A higher risk of fall injury was associated with initiating bupropion (HR 1.20 to 1.61), duloxetine (HR 1.27 to 1.36), paroxetine (HR 1.14 to 1.22), and venlafaxine (HR 1.22 to 1.34) when compared to (es)citalopram or sertraline. New use of duloxetine, bupropion, paroxetine, and venlafaxine was associated with a higher risk of fall injury compared to (es)citalopram and sertraline.","PeriodicalId":74431,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma2030018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though it is well documented that antidepressants are associated with an increased risk of falls in older adults at the drug class level, the comparative risk between individual antidepressants for fall injury in older adults with depression is unknown. Currently, clinicians are making decisions at the drug class level without consideration of the potential that there could be safer choices within classes. We compared the risk of fall injury among initiators of bupropion, duloxetine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and venlafaxine to those of (es)citalopram and, separately, sertraline. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the MarketScan® Medicare Supplemental claims from 2007 to 2019. Individuals had incident depression (washout in previous continually enrolled year) with a first antidepressant claim up to three months after depression diagnosis. Individuals were followed for the first three months of antidepressant use until the first occurrence of fall injury, change/discontinuation of antidepressant, discontinued insurance coverage, or end of study. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for each antidepressant comparison and fall injury. We identified 114,505 individuals (mean age 76.6 years, 68% female, 97% without prior fall). A higher risk of fall injury was associated with initiating bupropion (HR 1.20 to 1.61), duloxetine (HR 1.27 to 1.36), paroxetine (HR 1.14 to 1.22), and venlafaxine (HR 1.22 to 1.34) when compared to (es)citalopram or sertraline. New use of duloxetine, bupropion, paroxetine, and venlafaxine was associated with a higher risk of fall injury compared to (es)citalopram and sertraline.
抗抑郁药和美国老年人意外抑郁症跌倒相关损伤的风险:一项比较安全性分析
虽然有充分的证据表明,抗抑郁药在药物级别上与老年人跌倒风险增加有关,但个体抗抑郁药对老年人抑郁症跌倒损伤的比较风险尚不清楚。目前,临床医生在药物类别水平上做出决定,而没有考虑类别内可能存在更安全选择的可能性。我们比较了安非他酮、度洛西汀、氟西汀、帕罗西汀和文拉法辛与西酞普兰和舍曲林的跌倒损伤风险。我们使用2007年至2019年MarketScan®医疗保险补充索赔进行了一项回顾性队列研究。在抑郁症诊断后3个月内首次服用抗抑郁药的个体发生抑郁症(在之前连续登记的年份中剔除)。个体在使用抗抑郁药的前三个月被跟踪,直到第一次发生跌倒伤害,改变/停止抗抑郁药,停止保险覆盖或研究结束。治疗加权Cox比例风险模型的倾向评分逆概率估计了每种抗抑郁药比较和跌倒损伤的风险比(hr)和95%置信区间。我们确定了114,505例患者(平均年龄76.6岁,68%为女性,97%没有跌倒史)。与西酞普兰或舍曲林相比,开始使用安非他酮(危险度1.20至1.61)、度洛西汀(危险度1.27至1.36)、帕罗西汀(危险度1.14至1.22)和文拉法辛(危险度1.22至1.34)的患者摔倒损伤风险较高。与西酞普兰和舍曲林相比,度洛西汀、安非他酮、帕罗西汀和文拉法辛的新使用与更高的跌倒损伤风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信