{"title":"Personvernregler og forskningsetikk: Blir det fortsatt mulig å gjøre antropologisk skoleforskning?","authors":"Lise Lundh","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2898-2020-03-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article draws on experiences from generating data for a PhD. During the period of fieldwork in a Norwegian school, new regulations based on EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) were implemented. With refer-ence to similar experiences from various Norwegian anthropologists, the article argues that the new regulations mar-ginalise ethnographic work even further. I suggest that an overall positivistic notion of research data might lie behind this, and I argue that a consequence could be that we simultaneously lose ways to perceive and understand silent knowledge and backstage knowledge. Furthermore, I argue that, in some cases, fulfilling the demand for documen-tation might inflict harm on people whom the regulations are intended to protect.","PeriodicalId":38612,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2898-2020-03-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The article draws on experiences from generating data for a PhD. During the period of fieldwork in a Norwegian school, new regulations based on EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) were implemented. With refer-ence to similar experiences from various Norwegian anthropologists, the article argues that the new regulations mar-ginalise ethnographic work even further. I suggest that an overall positivistic notion of research data might lie behind this, and I argue that a consequence could be that we simultaneously lose ways to perceive and understand silent knowledge and backstage knowledge. Furthermore, I argue that, in some cases, fulfilling the demand for documen-tation might inflict harm on people whom the regulations are intended to protect.