On the Death of Implicit Association Tests (IATs)

IF 3.2 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000778

Jessica Röhner, D. Iliescu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

“The IAT Is Dead, Long Live the IAT [. . .]” is the title of an article that might reflect the impression of many researchers who are unsure about whether IATs are useful measures or not (Jost, 2019, p. 10). A Web of Science search on the number of IAT-related publications shows that although IAT research has increased over the years, there are several ups and downs (Figure 1). This editorial provides insights into some issues that may partly explain this phenomenon and encourage researchers to use in-depth analyses to help identify the conditions in which IATs may be useful.

查看原文本刊更多论文

论内隐联想测验的消亡

“IAT已死，IAT万岁[…]”是一篇文章的标题，这篇文章可能反映了许多研究人员的印象，他们不确定IAT是否是有用的衡量标准（Jost，2019，第10页）。科学网对IAT相关出版物数量的搜索显示，尽管IAT研究多年来有所增加，但也有一些起伏（图1）。这篇社论深入了解了一些可能部分解释这一现象的问题，并鼓励研究人员使用深入分析来帮助确定IAT可能有用的条件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The main purpose of the EJPA is to present important articles which provide seminal information on both theoretical and applied developments in this field. Articles reporting the construction of new measures or an advancement of an existing measure are given priority. The journal is directed to practitioners as well as to academicians: The conviction of its editors is that the discipline of psychological assessment should, necessarily and firmly, be attached to the roots of psychological science, while going deeply into all the consequences of its applied, practice-oriented development.