Introduction

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Stephen J. Roddy
{"title":"Introduction","authors":"Stephen J. Roddy","doi":"10.1215/23290048-9681124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of the Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture has brought an exceptionally accomplished group of scholars together to reflect on the impact of theoretical and methodological trends on our field. Surveying the past achievements, current state, and future prospects of the study of premodern Chinese literature from broadly cosmopolitan theoretical and comparative perspectives, these scholars address, inter alia, the following questions: What place do works written in aWestern language and/or from perspectives informed substantially by non-Chinese scholarship occupywithin the full ambit of Chinese literary studies? If scholarship written in English or other Western languages is for the most part pitched primarily to non-Chinese audiences, what are its strengths and weaknesses for native-speaking readers? And, how has theoretically informed work complemented and drawn upon the rapidly expanding body of Chineseand other East Asian–language research in these fields? Finally, what is the current state of the dialogue between scholarship on Chinese literature— whether in Western languages or not—and that of other literatures? Has it resulted in any significant impacts on the latter, or on the literary field as awhole? Each of the nine articles in this issue takes a slightly different tack in treating their respective genres, fields, or texts. While the first four engage primarily in retrospective surveys of previous scholarship, the remaining five introduce and apply relatively novel conceptual and interpretive models to Chinese examples. Although this division is far from absolute—all of the articles engage to some degree in both of these exercises—we have organized the chapters into two sections to reflect their relative differences in emphasis. In aggregate, all nine authors both argue for and demonstrate the value of the","PeriodicalId":53810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23290048-9681124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue of the Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture has brought an exceptionally accomplished group of scholars together to reflect on the impact of theoretical and methodological trends on our field. Surveying the past achievements, current state, and future prospects of the study of premodern Chinese literature from broadly cosmopolitan theoretical and comparative perspectives, these scholars address, inter alia, the following questions: What place do works written in aWestern language and/or from perspectives informed substantially by non-Chinese scholarship occupywithin the full ambit of Chinese literary studies? If scholarship written in English or other Western languages is for the most part pitched primarily to non-Chinese audiences, what are its strengths and weaknesses for native-speaking readers? And, how has theoretically informed work complemented and drawn upon the rapidly expanding body of Chineseand other East Asian–language research in these fields? Finally, what is the current state of the dialogue between scholarship on Chinese literature— whether in Western languages or not—and that of other literatures? Has it resulted in any significant impacts on the latter, or on the literary field as awhole? Each of the nine articles in this issue takes a slightly different tack in treating their respective genres, fields, or texts. While the first four engage primarily in retrospective surveys of previous scholarship, the remaining five introduce and apply relatively novel conceptual and interpretive models to Chinese examples. Although this division is far from absolute—all of the articles engage to some degree in both of these exercises—we have organized the chapters into two sections to reflect their relative differences in emphasis. In aggregate, all nine authors both argue for and demonstrate the value of the
介绍
《中国文学与文化杂志》的这一期特刊邀请了一批非常有成就的学者,共同探讨理论和方法趋势对我们这个领域的影响。这些学者从广泛的世界主义理论和比较的角度审视了前现代中国文学研究的过去成就、现状和未来前景,并特别提出了以下问题:用西方语言和/或从非中国学者的视角撰写的作品在中国文学研究的全部范围内占据什么位置?如果用英语或其他西方语言撰写的学术论文大部分主要面向非中文读者,那么它对母语读者的优势和劣势是什么?在这些领域中,理论研究工作如何补充和借鉴迅速扩大的中文和其他东亚语言研究?最后,中国文学(无论是西方语言还是非西方语言)与其他文学之间的对话现状如何?它是否对后者或整个文学界产生了重大影响?这期的九篇文章中的每一篇在处理各自的体裁、领域或文本时都采取了略有不同的策略。前四篇主要是对以前的学术研究进行回顾性调查,其余五篇则介绍并应用相对新颖的概念和解释模型来分析中国的例子。尽管这种划分远非绝对——所有的文章都在一定程度上涉及这两种练习——我们将章节组织成两个部分,以反映它们在重点上的相对差异。总的来说,这九位作者都主张并论证了……的价值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信