O posicionamento de assentimento em comentários de internautas ao discurso de acusação no impeachment de Dilma Rousseff

Abstract

Este artigo discute acerca do posicionamento de assentimento, em mensagens postadas por internautas, na pagina do canal YouTube, sobre o discurso de acusacao de Janaina Paschoal no julgamento de impeachment da presidente Dilma Rousseff. A luz da Analise de Discurso pecheutiana, buscamos identificar as filiacoes interdiscursivas sustentadas nesses assentimentos e seus efeitos de sentidos. Para tanto, fundamentamo-nos em Courtine (2009), Orlandi (2001), Pecheux (1975; 1993), entre outros. Nosso objeto de analise e o modo de funcionamento desse posicionamento de assentimento, a partir das recorrencias de determinados termos. Em um batimento entre a teoria e os fatos analisados, como exige o metodo de AD, identificamos os principais funcionamentos e concluimos que os internautas que se posicionaram em assentimento ao discurso da acusacao fizeram-no a partir de filiacoes interdiscursivas. Assim, esse posicionamento ao discurso acusatorio e interpretado como manifestacao subjetiva de formacoes discursivo-ideologicas desses sujeitos. The assent positioning in netizens’ comments on the discourse of accusation in Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment In this article we discuss the assent positioning in messages posted by netizens on YouTube regarding Janaina Paschoal’s discourse of accusation in President Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment trial. In the light of Pecheux's contribution to Discourse Analysis, there was an attempt to identify the interdiscursive affiliations in which these assents were based on as well as the meaning effects contained therein. To that end, we are based in Courtine (2009), Orlandi (2001), Pecheux (1975; 1993), among others. Our subject of analysis is the way this assent positioning works, observing the repetition of specific terms. Confronting the theory and the analyzed facts, we identified the most important ways this positioning work and concluded that the ones who stood in agreement with the discourse of accusation, did so based on interdiscursive affiliations. Thus, this positioning related to the accusatory discourse is understood as subjective manifestations of these subject’s discursive-ideological formations. Keywords: Discourse Analysis. Political discourse. Discursive positioning. Youtube DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019n63p70-82