Estimation of human oral fraction dose absorbed of simvastatin from various formulations using in-situ single pass intestinal perfusion method

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Madhu Verma, A. Nanda, Iti Chauhan, M. Yasir, Sagarika Majhi, Rajkumari, M. Sharma
{"title":"Estimation of human oral fraction dose absorbed of simvastatin from various formulations using in-situ single pass intestinal perfusion method","authors":"Madhu Verma, A. Nanda, Iti Chauhan, M. Yasir, Sagarika Majhi, Rajkumari, M. Sharma","doi":"10.2174/2210303113666230502150257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSIM is a poorly water-soluble drug with dissolution-dependent bioavailability. A solid dispersion and self-emulsifying drug delivery system was developed, optimized, and evaluated to improve its bioavailability. The permeability coefficient in rats was determined using the in-situ single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) technique. Further, the permeability coefficient (Peff, humans) was used to calculate the permeability and fraction of SIM bioavailable to humans which have not yet been reported for these formulations.\n\n\n\nTo estimate and compare various formulations of Simvastatin (SIM) for bioavailable fraction to humans (Fa) as a function of solubility enhancement.\n\n\n\nIn this study, the preparation and evaluation of SIM formulations i.e., Self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) and Solid dispersions (SD) are discussed in brief. An uncomplicated, precise, and accurate HPLC method was validated for simultaneous determination of SIM and phenol red as per ICH guidelines. A comparative in-vitro dissolution test, pharmacokinetic studies, and in-situ SPIP technique in rats were carried out amongst optimized formulations of SIM-SD and SIM-SEDDS, SIM suspension (SIM-SUSP), and SIM marketed preparation (SIM-MP).\n\n\n\nThe HPLC method was successfully validated. In-vitro dissolution test displays that both the SIM formulations i.e., SIM-SEDDS and SIM-SD shows better dissolution rate than SIM-MP and SIM-SUSP. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that SIM-SEDDS, SIM-SD, and SIM-MP showed significant differences when compared to SIM-SUSP in terms of Cmax, [AUC] 0-∞, at P ≤ 0.05. The comparison of permeability coefficient between SIM SEDDS vs SIM MP and SIM SEDDS vs SIM SD were non-significant. In contrast, SIM- SUSP vs all other formulations were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 (employing two-way ANOVA followed by post-Bonferroni Test). Fa for SIM SUSP, an optimized formulation of SIM-SEDDS, SIM-MP, and SIM-SD are 0.353, 0.977, 0.975, and 0.987 respectively. It is revealed that SIM-SEDDS and SIM-SD showed enhanced absorption and the results are confirmed by in-vitro data, pharmacokinetic studies, and In-situ SPIP techniques.\n\n\n\nThe permeability prediction method is a rapid and economical method for screening chemical compounds with the least possible utilization of resources. So, its use can be extended in prime and initial screening prototypes for the evaluation of compounds in the early stages of their formulations.\n","PeriodicalId":11310,"journal":{"name":"Drug Delivery Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Delivery Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210303113666230502150257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIM is a poorly water-soluble drug with dissolution-dependent bioavailability. A solid dispersion and self-emulsifying drug delivery system was developed, optimized, and evaluated to improve its bioavailability. The permeability coefficient in rats was determined using the in-situ single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) technique. Further, the permeability coefficient (Peff, humans) was used to calculate the permeability and fraction of SIM bioavailable to humans which have not yet been reported for these formulations. To estimate and compare various formulations of Simvastatin (SIM) for bioavailable fraction to humans (Fa) as a function of solubility enhancement. In this study, the preparation and evaluation of SIM formulations i.e., Self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) and Solid dispersions (SD) are discussed in brief. An uncomplicated, precise, and accurate HPLC method was validated for simultaneous determination of SIM and phenol red as per ICH guidelines. A comparative in-vitro dissolution test, pharmacokinetic studies, and in-situ SPIP technique in rats were carried out amongst optimized formulations of SIM-SD and SIM-SEDDS, SIM suspension (SIM-SUSP), and SIM marketed preparation (SIM-MP). The HPLC method was successfully validated. In-vitro dissolution test displays that both the SIM formulations i.e., SIM-SEDDS and SIM-SD shows better dissolution rate than SIM-MP and SIM-SUSP. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that SIM-SEDDS, SIM-SD, and SIM-MP showed significant differences when compared to SIM-SUSP in terms of Cmax, [AUC] 0-∞, at P ≤ 0.05. The comparison of permeability coefficient between SIM SEDDS vs SIM MP and SIM SEDDS vs SIM SD were non-significant. In contrast, SIM- SUSP vs all other formulations were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 (employing two-way ANOVA followed by post-Bonferroni Test). Fa for SIM SUSP, an optimized formulation of SIM-SEDDS, SIM-MP, and SIM-SD are 0.353, 0.977, 0.975, and 0.987 respectively. It is revealed that SIM-SEDDS and SIM-SD showed enhanced absorption and the results are confirmed by in-vitro data, pharmacokinetic studies, and In-situ SPIP techniques. The permeability prediction method is a rapid and economical method for screening chemical compounds with the least possible utilization of resources. So, its use can be extended in prime and initial screening prototypes for the evaluation of compounds in the early stages of their formulations.
应用原位单通道肠道灌注法估算辛伐他汀从不同制剂中的人体口服吸收剂量
SIM是一种水溶性差的药物,具有溶解依赖性生物利用度。开发、优化并评价了一种固体分散自乳化给药系统,以提高其生物利用度。采用原位单通道肠灌注(SPIP)技术测定大鼠的渗透系数。此外,渗透系数(Peff,人类)用于计算人体可生物利用SIM的渗透性和分数,这些制剂尚未报道。评估和比较辛伐他汀(SIM)的各种制剂对人体的生物可利用部分(Fa)作为溶解度增强的函数。本研究简要讨论了SIM制剂的制备和评价,即自乳化给药系统(SEDDS)和固体分散体(SD)。根据ICH指南,验证了一种简单、精确、准确的HPLC方法用于同时测定SIM和酚红。在SIM-SD和SIM-SEDDS、SIM混悬液(SIM-SUSP)和SIM市售制剂(SIM-MP)的优化配方中,对大鼠进行了体外溶出度比较试验、药代动力学研究和原位SPIP技术。HPLC方法得到了成功验证。体外溶出度测试显示,SIM制剂,即SIM-SEDDS和SIM-SD,均显示出比SIM-MP和SIM-SUSP更好的溶出率。药代动力学研究表明,与SIM-SUSP相比,SIM-SDDS、SIM-SD和SIM-MP在Cmax、AUC]0-∞方面表现出显著差异,P≤0.05。SIM-SEDDS与SIM-MP、SIM-SEDDDS与SIM-SD的渗透系数比较不显著。相反,SIM-SUSP与所有其他配方在P≤0.05时有显著差异(采用双向ANOVA,然后进行Bonferroni后检验)。对于SIM-SUP,SIM-SEDDS、SIM-MP和SIM-SD的优化配方的Fa分别为0.353、0.977、0.975和0.987。结果表明,SIM-SEDDS和SIM-SD表现出增强的吸收,体外数据、药代动力学研究和原位SPIP技术证实了这一结果。渗透率预测方法是一种快速、经济、资源利用率最低的化合物筛选方法。因此,它的用途可以扩展到初级和初步筛选原型中,用于评估配方早期阶段的化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Delivery Letters
Drug Delivery Letters Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信