Geometric morphometric assessment of the fossil bears of Namur, Belgium: Allometry and ecomorphology

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Boreas Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1111/bor.12629
Anneke H. van Heteren, Mietje Germonpré
{"title":"Geometric morphometric assessment of the fossil bears of Namur, Belgium: Allometry and ecomorphology","authors":"Anneke H. van Heteren,&nbsp;Mietje Germonpré","doi":"10.1111/bor.12629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Namur area in Belgium is useful to study brown (<i>Ursus arctos</i>) and cave bears (<i>Ursus spelaeus</i>) as the assemblage contains little temporal and no geographical variation. Here, we aim to assess ontogenetic allometry within cave bears, as well as ecomorphological differences between adult brown bears (n = 9), adult cave bears (n = 5) and juvenile cave bears (n = 3). Landmarks for 3D digitization of the mandible were chosen based on the taphonomical damage of the specimens. Extant brown bears and extinct Pleistocene brown and cave bears were digitized with a Microscribe G2. Generalized Procrustes superimposition was performed on the coordinates. Allometry was studied using regression analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to assess ecomorphological differences between the groups. 61% of the shape variance within juvenile and adult cave bears was predicted by size (n = 8, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The juvenile cave bears have relatively deep horizontal rami. In adult cave bears, the horizontal ramus is much narrower dorsoventrally. Juvenile cave bears have a small masseteric fossa and a short coronoid process, whereas both are larger, relative to mandible size, in adult cave bears. This made juvenile cave bears likely less effective masticators than fully grown cave bears. In the PCA, principal component (PC) 1 accounts for 45.0% of the total variance and PC2 accounts for 27.6%. Fossil <i>U. arctos</i> from Namur fall within the 95% confidence interval of modern North American <i>U. arctos</i> on both PCs, but are more similar to cave bears than the average extant brown bear. From the similarity of fossil and modern brown bears, it can be deduced that the diet of fossil brown bears was probably also within the range of their modern North American conspecifics, although they might have been more efficient at masticating plant matter.</p>","PeriodicalId":9184,"journal":{"name":"Boreas","volume":"52 4","pages":"498-506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bor.12629","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boreas","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bor.12629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Namur area in Belgium is useful to study brown (Ursus arctos) and cave bears (Ursus spelaeus) as the assemblage contains little temporal and no geographical variation. Here, we aim to assess ontogenetic allometry within cave bears, as well as ecomorphological differences between adult brown bears (n = 9), adult cave bears (n = 5) and juvenile cave bears (n = 3). Landmarks for 3D digitization of the mandible were chosen based on the taphonomical damage of the specimens. Extant brown bears and extinct Pleistocene brown and cave bears were digitized with a Microscribe G2. Generalized Procrustes superimposition was performed on the coordinates. Allometry was studied using regression analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to assess ecomorphological differences between the groups. 61% of the shape variance within juvenile and adult cave bears was predicted by size (n = 8, p < 0.01). The juvenile cave bears have relatively deep horizontal rami. In adult cave bears, the horizontal ramus is much narrower dorsoventrally. Juvenile cave bears have a small masseteric fossa and a short coronoid process, whereas both are larger, relative to mandible size, in adult cave bears. This made juvenile cave bears likely less effective masticators than fully grown cave bears. In the PCA, principal component (PC) 1 accounts for 45.0% of the total variance and PC2 accounts for 27.6%. Fossil U. arctos from Namur fall within the 95% confidence interval of modern North American U. arctos on both PCs, but are more similar to cave bears than the average extant brown bear. From the similarity of fossil and modern brown bears, it can be deduced that the diet of fossil brown bears was probably also within the range of their modern North American conspecifics, although they might have been more efficient at masticating plant matter.

Abstract Image

比利时那慕尔熊化石的几何形态计量学评估:异速学和生态形态学
比利时那木尔地区对研究棕熊(熊)和洞熊(熊)很有用,因为它们的组合几乎没有时间和地理变化。在此,我们旨在评估洞熊的个体发育异速,以及成年棕熊(n = 9)、成年洞熊(n = 5)和幼年洞熊(n = 3)之间的生态形态学差异。根据标本的音标损伤选择下颌骨三维数字化的标志。用Microscribe G2对现存棕熊和已灭绝的更新世棕熊和洞熊进行了数字化。对坐标进行广义Procrustes叠加。采用回归分析研究异速生长。采用主成分分析(PCA)评价各组间生态形态差异。洞熊幼熊和成年洞熊61%的形状变异可通过体型预测(n = 8, p < 0.01)。幼年洞熊的水平支相对较深。在成年洞熊中,水平分支的背侧和腹侧要窄得多。幼年洞熊有一个小的咬窝和一个短的冠突,而成年洞熊两者相对于下颌骨的大小都更大。这使得幼年洞熊的咀嚼能力可能不如成年洞熊。在PCA中,主成分(pc1)占总方差的45.0%,主成分(PC2)占总方差的27.6%。在两台电脑上发现的那木尔熊化石属于现代北美熊的95%置信区间,但与现存的棕熊相比,它们更像洞熊。从棕熊化石和现代棕熊的相似之处可以推断,棕熊化石的饮食可能也在它们现代北美同类的范围内,尽管它们咀嚼植物的效率可能更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Boreas
Boreas 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Boreas has been published since 1972. Articles of wide international interest from all branches of Quaternary research are published. Biological as well as non-biological aspects of the Quaternary environment, in both glaciated and non-glaciated areas, are dealt with: Climate, shore displacement, glacial features, landforms, sediments, organisms and their habitat, and stratigraphical and chronological relationships. Anticipated international interest, at least within a continent or a considerable part of it, is a main criterion for the acceptance of papers. Besides articles, short items like discussion contributions and book reviews are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信