Comparing the effects of cognitive dual tasking on balance and gait motor performance in people with mild multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
H. Yakut, Tuba Maden, A. Akçali
{"title":"Comparing the effects of cognitive dual tasking on balance and gait motor performance in people with mild multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals","authors":"H. Yakut, Tuba Maden, A. Akçali","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2021.0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People with multiple sclerosis show both cognitive and postural impairment, and various static and dynamic postural activities may be affected under conditions of cognitive distraction. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of cognitive dual tasking on the balance and gait motor performance of people with mild multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 2.0 ± 1.3) and healthy people and to compare these two groups in terms of performing single and dual tasks. People with mild multiple sclerosis (n=39) and healthy individuals (n=33) performed static balance tests (Romberg's Test, tandem stance test, single-legged stance test) and dynamic balance tests (Functional Reach Test, Four Square Step Test, Timed Up and Go Test, 10-Metre Walk Test), with and without a word list generation test (single and dual tasks). Independent t-tests were used to evaluate differences between the two groups, and paired t-tests were used for single or dual tasks for all static and dynamic tests. The magnitude of differences in tasks between measures was expressed as Cohen's d. Dual task effects were more evident during dynamic balance tests in participants with multiple sclerosis and healthy participants (specifically the Timed Up and Go Test and 10-Metre Walk Test) (P<0.001). There was a significant difference between both groups only in terms of static balance (P<0.001). Dynamic balance and gait were shown to be more affected when performing the dual cognitive task than static balance in people with multiple sclerosis. Dual tasks should be included in diagnoses.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2021.0207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with multiple sclerosis show both cognitive and postural impairment, and various static and dynamic postural activities may be affected under conditions of cognitive distraction. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of cognitive dual tasking on the balance and gait motor performance of people with mild multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 2.0 ± 1.3) and healthy people and to compare these two groups in terms of performing single and dual tasks. People with mild multiple sclerosis (n=39) and healthy individuals (n=33) performed static balance tests (Romberg's Test, tandem stance test, single-legged stance test) and dynamic balance tests (Functional Reach Test, Four Square Step Test, Timed Up and Go Test, 10-Metre Walk Test), with and without a word list generation test (single and dual tasks). Independent t-tests were used to evaluate differences between the two groups, and paired t-tests were used for single or dual tasks for all static and dynamic tests. The magnitude of differences in tasks between measures was expressed as Cohen's d. Dual task effects were more evident during dynamic balance tests in participants with multiple sclerosis and healthy participants (specifically the Timed Up and Go Test and 10-Metre Walk Test) (P<0.001). There was a significant difference between both groups only in terms of static balance (P<0.001). Dynamic balance and gait were shown to be more affected when performing the dual cognitive task than static balance in people with multiple sclerosis. Dual tasks should be included in diagnoses.
比较认知双重任务对轻度多发性硬化症患者和健康人平衡和步态运动表现的影响
多发性硬化症患者表现为认知和姿势障碍,在认知分心的情况下,各种静态和动态姿势活动可能受到影响。本研究的目的是确定认知双重任务对轻度多发性硬化症患者(扩展残疾状态量表评分为2.0±1.3)和健康人的平衡和步态运动表现的影响,并比较两组在执行单一和双重任务方面的影响。轻度多发性硬化症患者(n=39)和健康个体(n=33)分别进行静态平衡测试(Romberg测试、双人站立测试、单腿站立测试)和动态平衡测试(功能伸展测试、四方步测试、计时起身和行走测试、10米步行测试),以及有和没有单词表生成测试(单任务和双任务)。独立t检验用于评估两组之间的差异,配对t检验用于所有静态和动态测试的单任务或双任务。测量之间任务差异的大小用Cohen’s d表示。双重任务效应在多发性硬化症参与者和健康参与者的动态平衡测试中更为明显(特别是计时起来和走测试和10米步行测试)(P<0.001)。两组间仅在静态平衡方面有显著差异(P<0.001)。多发性硬化症患者在执行双重认知任务时,动态平衡和步态比静态平衡受到的影响更大。双重任务应包括在诊断中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信