{"title":"The Polish Constitutional Tribunal Crisis from the Perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights","authors":"M. Szwed","doi":"10.1017/S1574019622000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" This case note analyses the judgment issued by the European Court of Human Rights on 7 May 2021 in Application No. 4907/18, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland. 1 In this judgment, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the participation of an unlawfully elected person on the panel of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that discontinued proceedings on the constitutional complaint fi led by a private applicant led to a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR. The Strasbourg Court ’ s judgment is of fundamental importance for several reasons. First, it clari fi ed the scope of applicability of Article 6 to constitutional courts and contributed to the Court ’ s case law on the right to a tribunal established by law, which has been developing rapidly since the landmark ruling in Ástráðsson v Iceland.","PeriodicalId":45815,"journal":{"name":"European Constitutional Law Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"132 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Constitutional Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This case note analyses the judgment issued by the European Court of Human Rights on 7 May 2021 in Application No. 4907/18, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland. 1 In this judgment, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the participation of an unlawfully elected person on the panel of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that discontinued proceedings on the constitutional complaint fi led by a private applicant led to a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR. The Strasbourg Court ’ s judgment is of fundamental importance for several reasons. First, it clari fi ed the scope of applicability of Article 6 to constitutional courts and contributed to the Court ’ s case law on the right to a tribunal established by law, which has been developing rapidly since the landmark ruling in Ástráðsson v Iceland.
这种情况下注意分析判断欧洲人权法庭发布的2021年5月7日申请4907/18号鑫元鸿福罗w Polsce sp.是一家v波兰。1在这个判断,欧洲人权法院裁定一个非法当选人的参与小组的波兰宪法法庭中止诉讼的宪法诉讼fi为首的一个私人申请人导致ECHR的违反第六条。出于几个原因,斯特拉斯堡法院的判决具有根本性的重要性。首先,它明确了第6条对宪法法院的适用范围,并对法院关于依法设立法庭的权利的判例法作出了贡献,自Ástráðsson诉冰岛一案具有里程碑意义的裁决以来,这一判例法得到了迅速发展。
期刊介绍:
The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.