The Collaboration of Human Resource Management and Line Management–An International Comparison

Q2 Social Sciences
Klaas Szierbowski-Seibel, Bernhard A. Wach, Rüdiger Kabst
{"title":"The Collaboration of Human Resource Management and Line Management–An International Comparison","authors":"Klaas Szierbowski-Seibel, Bernhard A. Wach, Rüdiger Kabst","doi":"10.1080/15416518.2019.1679076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The extant research advocates for the strategic integration of human resource management (HRM) in managerial decision making to foster firm performance. However, the empirical evidence of a stronger strategic integration of HRM is still limited, especially in terms of strategic guidelines such as a human resource (HR) strategy and international comparative matters. Drawing on responses from 588 German and US-based organizations and related to the new institutionalism theory, this study examines whether a HRM partnership (i.e., sharing responsibilities between HRM and line management) that represents a particular form of strategic integration of HRM is beneficial for organizations. In particular, we find international differences as a more pronounced HRM partnership increases employee turnover in the USA, whereas no significant changes are encountered in Germany. We further demonstrate that organizations located in the USA are more likely to have a formal HR strategy compared to those in Germany. However, this study can neither provide support for the direct effect of a HRM partnership on employee turnover nor of a moderation of this relationship through the HR strategy.","PeriodicalId":39393,"journal":{"name":"Organization Management Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"262 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15416518.2019.1679076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2019.1679076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extant research advocates for the strategic integration of human resource management (HRM) in managerial decision making to foster firm performance. However, the empirical evidence of a stronger strategic integration of HRM is still limited, especially in terms of strategic guidelines such as a human resource (HR) strategy and international comparative matters. Drawing on responses from 588 German and US-based organizations and related to the new institutionalism theory, this study examines whether a HRM partnership (i.e., sharing responsibilities between HRM and line management) that represents a particular form of strategic integration of HRM is beneficial for organizations. In particular, we find international differences as a more pronounced HRM partnership increases employee turnover in the USA, whereas no significant changes are encountered in Germany. We further demonstrate that organizations located in the USA are more likely to have a formal HR strategy compared to those in Germany. However, this study can neither provide support for the direct effect of a HRM partnership on employee turnover nor of a moderation of this relationship through the HR strategy.
人力资源管理与直线管理的合作——国际比较
现有研究主张将人力资源管理(HRM)战略整合到管理决策中,以提高企业绩效。然而,加强人力资源管理战略整合的经验证据仍然有限,特别是在人力资源战略和国际比较事项等战略指导方针方面。根据588家德国和美国组织的回应,并与新制度主义理论相关,本研究考察了代表人力资源管理战略整合特定形式的人力资源管理伙伴关系(即人力资源管理和直线管理之间的责任分担)是否对组织有益。特别是,我们发现了国际差异,因为在美国,更明显的人力资源管理伙伴关系增加了员工流动,而在德国没有遇到重大变化。我们进一步证明,与德国相比,美国的组织更有可能制定正式的人力资源战略。然而,这项研究既不能支持人力资源管理伙伴关系对员工流动的直接影响,也不能支持通过人力资源战略调节这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Organization Management Journal
Organization Management Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Organization Management Journal is a blind peer-reviewed online publication sponsored by the Eastern Academy of Management. OMJ is designed as a forum for broad philosophical, social, and practical thought about management and organizing. We are interested in papers that address the interface between theoretical insight and practical application and enhance the teaching of management. OMJ publishes scholarly empirical and theoretical papers, review articles, essays and resources for management educators. Appropriate domains include: -Organizational behavior- Business strategy and policy- Organizational theory- Human resource management- Management education, particularly experiential education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信