The Design and Psychometric Properties of the Tendency to Use Covid-19 Vaccine Questionnaire based on the Health Belief Model
Q2 Health Professions
J. Kazemi, M. Saffari, M. Raei, H. Rashidi-Jahan, F. Rahmati
{"title":"The Design and Psychometric Properties of the Tendency to Use Covid-19 Vaccine Questionnaire based on the Health Belief Model","authors":"J. Kazemi, M. Saffari, M. Raei, H. Rashidi-Jahan, F. Rahmati","doi":"10.52547/ijhehp.10.3.299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: It is necessary to have a suitable tool for measuring the tendency to use the Covid-19 vaccine. The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the tendency to use Covid-19 vaccine questionnaire among health care workers of a hospital in Tehran, Iran. Materials and Methods: This is an instrumentation type of methodological. Fifty-six questions were considered as the items of the questionnaire. For testing the validity, the face validity and content validity were used in correspondence with 10 experts’ opinions. Reliability check was performed through the Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest. Finally, the structural validity was evaluated with 474 subjects. Results: The results showed that the scales of the tendency to use Covid-19 vaccine questionnaire have an appropriate face validity for all items with an impact score higher than 1.5 and an appropriate content validity ratio in the range of 0.70 and a sufficient content validity index in the range of 0.73 to 087. Also, it had an acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) in the range of 0.87 to 0.96. Also, the reliability of the test-retest ranged from 0.68 to 0.92. For the structural validity, 8 factors were selected with a factor value higher than 0.4. Also, in the confirmatory section of the factors an acceptable goodness of fit index (GFI) (Range from 0.91 to 0.98) and the root mean square error in the range of 0.33 to 0.49 was achieved. In total, four questions were removed in the content validity ratio review stage and one question was removed in the content validity index review stage. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the tendency to use Covid-19 vaccine questionnaire has sufficient validity and reliability and is a suitable tool for evaluating the health staff’s tendency towards vaccination. Ultimately, this questionnaire was approved with 8 factors (perceived sensitivity, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, self-efficacy, knowledge and behavior) and 51 questions. © 2022 Iranian Association of Health Education and Health Promotion. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":33500,"journal":{"name":"amwzsh bhdsht w rtq slmt yrn","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"amwzsh bhdsht w rtq slmt yrn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijhehp.10.3.299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objective: It is necessary to have a suitable tool for measuring the tendency to use the Covid-19 vaccine. The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the tendency to use Covid-19 vaccine questionnaire among health care workers of a hospital in Tehran, Iran. Materials and Methods: This is an instrumentation type of methodological. Fifty-six questions were considered as the items of the questionnaire. For testing the validity, the face validity and content validity were used in correspondence with 10 experts’ opinions. Reliability check was performed through the Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest. Finally, the structural validity was evaluated with 474 subjects. Results: The results showed that the scales of the tendency to use Covid-19 vaccine questionnaire have an appropriate face validity for all items with an impact score higher than 1.5 and an appropriate content validity ratio in the range of 0.70 and a sufficient content validity index in the range of 0.73 to 087. Also, it had an acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) in the range of 0.87 to 0.96. Also, the reliability of the test-retest ranged from 0.68 to 0.92. For the structural validity, 8 factors were selected with a factor value higher than 0.4. Also, in the confirmatory section of the factors an acceptable goodness of fit index (GFI) (Range from 0.91 to 0.98) and the root mean square error in the range of 0.33 to 0.49 was achieved. In total, four questions were removed in the content validity ratio review stage and one question was removed in the content validity index review stage. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the tendency to use Covid-19 vaccine questionnaire has sufficient validity and reliability and is a suitable tool for evaluating the health staff’s tendency towards vaccination. Ultimately, this questionnaire was approved with 8 factors (perceived sensitivity, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, self-efficacy, knowledge and behavior) and 51 questions. © 2022 Iranian Association of Health Education and Health Promotion. All rights reserved.
基于健康信念模型的新型冠状病毒疫苗使用倾向问卷设计及心理测量学性质
背景与目的:有必要有一个合适的工具来衡量Covid-19疫苗的使用趋势。本研究的目的是确定伊朗德黑兰一家医院医护人员使用Covid-19疫苗倾向问卷的效度和信度。材料和方法:这是一种仪器类型的方法学。56个问题被认为是问卷的项目。为了检验效度,采用了面孔效度和内容效度来对应10位专家的意见。通过Cronbach’s alpha和重测进行信度检验。最后对474名被试进行结构效度评估。结果:新冠病毒疫苗使用倾向问卷各量表的正面效度均在1.5分以上,内容效度比在0.70范围内,内容效度指数在0.73 ~ 087范围内。此外,它具有可接受的内部一致性信度(Cronbach's alpha),范围为0.87至0.96。重测信度为0.68 ~ 0.92。对于结构效度,选取因子值大于0.4的因子8个。此外,在因素的验证部分,获得了可接受的拟合优度指数(GFI)(范围为0.91至0.98)和均方根误差(范围为0.33至0.49)。总共在内容效度比审查阶段删除了4个问题,在内容效度指标审查阶段删除了1个问题。结论:本研究结果表明,Covid-19疫苗使用倾向问卷具有足够的效度和信度,是评价卫生人员疫苗接种倾向的合适工具。最终通过8个因素(感知敏感性、感知严重性、感知利益、感知障碍、行动线索、自我效能感、知识和行为)和51个问题对问卷进行审核。©2022伊朗健康教育和健康促进协会。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。