Governmental Policies in Managing COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Vietnam, Period of January – March 2020

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
S. Salsabila, Inge Dhamanti
{"title":"Governmental Policies in Managing COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Vietnam, Period of January – March 2020","authors":"S. Salsabila, Inge Dhamanti","doi":"10.26553/JIKM.2021.12.1.1-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since WHO declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic, COVID-19 management has become a problem for countries with limited resources and weak health systems. The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of policies in Indonesia and Vietnam, in which both countries have limited resources in facing the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study is a narrative review which compares he COVID-19 policies in two countries. The study is conducted by searching relevant literature on Google Scholar with the keywords \"Penerapan Kebijakan COVID-19 di Indonesia\", \"COVID-19 policy responses in Vietnam\", \"lesson from limited resource country to control COVID-19\", and also scrutinizing the official website managed by the Indonesian Ministry of Health and the Vietnam Ministry of Health. The inclusion criteria are open access papers published between December 2019 and March 2020 in the form of original articles and review articles. This study found the differences in policy implementation between Indonesia and Vietnam in terms of the number of policies, implementation time, scope, and the basis for making policy decisions. Unlike Indonesia, the implementation of policies carried out in Vietnam is more anticipatory, based on previous experience in dealing with the SARS epidemic in 2003. In dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic, as a country with limited resources in the health system, it is very important to implement policies that are more preventive and anticipatory based on  past experience in dealing with pandemics.","PeriodicalId":45460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26553/JIKM.2021.12.1.1-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since WHO declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic, COVID-19 management has become a problem for countries with limited resources and weak health systems. The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of policies in Indonesia and Vietnam, in which both countries have limited resources in facing the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study is a narrative review which compares he COVID-19 policies in two countries. The study is conducted by searching relevant literature on Google Scholar with the keywords "Penerapan Kebijakan COVID-19 di Indonesia", "COVID-19 policy responses in Vietnam", "lesson from limited resource country to control COVID-19", and also scrutinizing the official website managed by the Indonesian Ministry of Health and the Vietnam Ministry of Health. The inclusion criteria are open access papers published between December 2019 and March 2020 in the form of original articles and review articles. This study found the differences in policy implementation between Indonesia and Vietnam in terms of the number of policies, implementation time, scope, and the basis for making policy decisions. Unlike Indonesia, the implementation of policies carried out in Vietnam is more anticipatory, based on previous experience in dealing with the SARS epidemic in 2003. In dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic, as a country with limited resources in the health system, it is very important to implement policies that are more preventive and anticipatory based on  past experience in dealing with pandemics.
政府应对COVID-19大流行的政策:印度尼西亚和越南的比较研究,2020年1月至3月
自世卫组织宣布COVID-19为全球大流行以来,COVID-19的管理已成为资源有限和卫生系统薄弱的国家面临的一个问题。本文的目的是描述印度尼西亚和越南的政策实施情况,这两个国家在应对COVID-19大流行方面的资源有限。本研究是一项叙事回顾,比较了两个国家的COVID-19政策。本研究以“Penerapan Kebijakan COVID-19 di Indonesia”、“越南应对COVID-19的政策”、“资源有限国家控制COVID-19的经验教训”为关键词,在谷歌Scholar上检索相关文献,并查阅印尼卫生部和越南卫生部管理的官方网站。纳入标准为2019年12月至2020年3月之间发表的开放获取论文,形式为原创文章和综述文章。本研究发现印尼与越南在政策执行上,在政策数量、执行时间、范围、决策依据等方面存在差异。与印度尼西亚不同的是,根据2003年处理非典型肺炎疫情的经验,越南实施的政策更具预见性。在应对COVID-19大流行的过程中,作为一个卫生系统资源有限的国家,根据过去应对大流行的经验,实施更具预防性和预见性的政策非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: JIKM is a refereed journal published quarterly by World Scientific and dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and practical information in the field of information processing and knowledge management. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and government contributors on all aspects of information processing, information management, knowledge management, tools, techniques and technologies, knowledge creation and sharing, best practices, policies and guidelines. JIKM is an international journal aimed at providing quality information to subscribers around the world. Managed by an international editorial board, JIKM positions itself as one of the leading scholarly journals in the field of information processing and knowledge management. It is a good reference for both information and knowledge management professionals. The journal covers key areas in the field of information and knowledge management. Research papers, practical applications, working papers, and case studies are invited in the following areas: -Business intelligence and competitive intelligence -Communication and organizational culture -e-Learning and life long learning -Electronic records and document management -Information processing and information management -Information organization, taxonomies and ontology -Intellectual capital -Knowledge creation, retention, sharing and transfer -Knowledge discovery, data and text mining -Knowledge management and innovations -Knowledge management education -Knowledge management tools and technologies -Knowledge management measurements -Knowledge professionals and leadership -Learning organization and organizational learning -Practical implementations of knowledge management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信