{"title":"Was the Egyptianized Pottery Cache from Megiddo a Foundation Deposit of Megaron Temple 4040? Response to Matthew J. Adams","authors":"D. Ussishkin","doi":"10.1080/03344355.2018.1494790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent paper, Matthew J. Adams argued that the Egyptianized pottery cache discovered in the renewed excavations at Megiddo is a foundation deposit in Egyptian character of Megaron Temple 4040. This conclusion is partly based on his analysis of the stratigraphy of Area J (University of Chicago’s Area BB). The present response argues (1) that the stratigraphic conclusions made at the time by the excavators rather than those of Adams are correct, and (2) that the cache is not a foundation deposit.","PeriodicalId":51839,"journal":{"name":"Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University","volume":"45 1","pages":"216 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03344355.2018.1494790","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03344355.2018.1494790","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In a recent paper, Matthew J. Adams argued that the Egyptianized pottery cache discovered in the renewed excavations at Megiddo is a foundation deposit in Egyptian character of Megaron Temple 4040. This conclusion is partly based on his analysis of the stratigraphy of Area J (University of Chicago’s Area BB). The present response argues (1) that the stratigraphic conclusions made at the time by the excavators rather than those of Adams are correct, and (2) that the cache is not a foundation deposit.
在最近的一篇论文中,马修·j·亚当斯(Matthew J. Adams)认为,在米吉多重新发掘中发现的埃及化陶器是具有埃及特征的米加隆神庙4040的基础沉积物。这一结论部分是基于他对J区(芝加哥大学BB区)地层的分析。目前的回应认为(1)当时由挖掘者而不是亚当斯得出的地层结论是正确的,(2)贮藏物不是地基沉积物。