Business meetings in the metaverse: stakeholder views evolve

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Maxime Besson, S. Gauttier
{"title":"Business meetings in the metaverse: stakeholder views evolve","authors":"Maxime Besson, S. Gauttier","doi":"10.1108/jbs-02-2023-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nOrganizations have started using the metaverse to sell non-fungible tokens, execute engineering processes and conduct business meetings. A condition of creating value by moving business processes to the metaverse is acceptance of this technology. In business-to-business scenarios, internal employees and external partners may have different views on the topic but must agree upon new practices. Understanding common motivations and challenges associated with using the metaverse is crucial to its success.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors interviewed managers from a pharmaceutical company considering conducting meetings with clients in the metaverse. A series of 23 statements on reasons for (non)-use was generated. Twenty-five individuals (13 employees and 12 clients) then ranked these statements against each other, revealing what would drive or hinder their metaverse use. The authors compared these perspectives to identify common issues.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors identified four different views. Views 1 and 2 correspond to internal and external participants, while Views 3 and 4 correspond to external ones only. View 1 is skeptical and underlines the role of peers in acceptance. View 2 is a positive perspective centered on usefulness. View 3 is ambivalent and is centered on efforts required to use the metaverse. View 4 reveals a reversed perspective wherein using the metaverse is a low-effort activity.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper proposes a case study probing acceptance of a realistic business use of the metaverse. This paper identifies risks to mitigate and motivations to leverage when proposing metaverse usage in a business-to-business context.\n","PeriodicalId":55881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Strategy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-02-2023-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Organizations have started using the metaverse to sell non-fungible tokens, execute engineering processes and conduct business meetings. A condition of creating value by moving business processes to the metaverse is acceptance of this technology. In business-to-business scenarios, internal employees and external partners may have different views on the topic but must agree upon new practices. Understanding common motivations and challenges associated with using the metaverse is crucial to its success. Design/methodology/approach The authors interviewed managers from a pharmaceutical company considering conducting meetings with clients in the metaverse. A series of 23 statements on reasons for (non)-use was generated. Twenty-five individuals (13 employees and 12 clients) then ranked these statements against each other, revealing what would drive or hinder their metaverse use. The authors compared these perspectives to identify common issues. Findings The authors identified four different views. Views 1 and 2 correspond to internal and external participants, while Views 3 and 4 correspond to external ones only. View 1 is skeptical and underlines the role of peers in acceptance. View 2 is a positive perspective centered on usefulness. View 3 is ambivalent and is centered on efforts required to use the metaverse. View 4 reveals a reversed perspective wherein using the metaverse is a low-effort activity. Originality/value This paper proposes a case study probing acceptance of a realistic business use of the metaverse. This paper identifies risks to mitigate and motivations to leverage when proposing metaverse usage in a business-to-business context.
元环境中的业务会议:涉众的观点在演变
目的组织已经开始使用元宇宙来销售不可替代的代币,执行工程流程和召开商业会议。通过将业务流程转移到元宇宙来创造价值的一个条件是接受这项技术。在企业对企业的场景中,内部员工和外部合作伙伴可能对该主题有不同的看法,但必须就新的实践达成一致。理解与使用元宇宙相关的共同动机和挑战对其成功至关重要。设计/方法论/方法作者采访了一家考虑在元宇宙中与客户会面的制药公司的经理。生成了一系列23条关于(不)使用原因的声明。然后,25个人(13名员工和12名客户)对这些陈述进行了排名,揭示了哪些因素会推动或阻碍他们使用元宇宙。作者比较了这些观点,找出了共同的问题。发现作者提出了四种不同的观点。视图1和2分别对应内部和外部参与者,而视图3和4仅对应外部参与者。观点1持怀疑态度,并强调了同行在接受中的作用。观点2是以有用性为中心的积极观点。观点3是矛盾的,并且集中在使用元宇宙所需的努力上。视图4揭示了一个相反的视角,其中使用元宇宙是一种低成本的活动。原创性/价值本文提出了一个案例研究,探讨接受元宇宙的现实商业用途。本文确定了在企业对企业环境中建议使用元宇宙时要减轻的风险和利用的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Business Strategy
Journal of Business Strategy Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Strategy publishes articles with a practical focus designed to help readers develop successful business strategies. Articles should say something new or different and may propose a unique perspective. They should not offer prescriptions to CEOs on how to manage, but rather be directed toward middle and senior managers at companies of all sizes and types, as well as consultants and academics who want to think about their businesses in new ways. Coverage: As one of the few journals dedicated to business strategy, JBS defines strategy in the broadest sense and thus covers topics as diverse as marketing strategy, innovation, developments in the global economy, mergers & acquisition integration and human resources. We have a penchant for substantive, provocative and well-written articles. We also like to break the mould and include articles on topics readers are unlikely to find in other business publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信