Reliability of a jugular venous pressure scale in cardiovascular clinical examination

Himel Mondal, Shaikat Mondal, Debasish Das, Nazmul Alam, Koushik Saha
{"title":"Reliability of a jugular venous pressure scale in cardiovascular clinical examination","authors":"Himel Mondal, Shaikat Mondal, Debasish Das, Nazmul Alam, Koushik Saha","doi":"10.4103/JCPC.JCPC_4_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Noninvasively jugular venous pressure (JVP) is measured at bedside commonly by card and ruler. New tools have been developed for the measurement of JVP with the basis of this method. However, these tools have some limitations. Aim: The aim of this study was (1) to develop a JVP scale which would be devoid of common problems faced with currently available devices and (2) to test the provisional validity and reliability of the device in the estimation of JVP. Materials and Methods: We used two common plastic rulers – one as vertical and one as horizontal. The vertical ruler was cut at the level of 5 cm mark. A piece of aluminum sheet was used to make an adapter in which the vertical ruler can slide. This adapter was attached to the horizontal ruler. Both the rulers were equipped with spirit-level capsules. This device was used by 16 raters to measure JVP on five individuals twice. Inter-rater, intra-rater, and test–retest reliability were checked by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 20 software package. Results: For average measures, inter-rater ICC was 0.998 (P < 0.001), intra-rater ICC was 0.981 (P < 0.001), and test–retest ICC was 0.829 (P = 0.001). Inter- and intra-rater reliability was “excellent,” whereas test–retest reliability was “good.” Conclusions: Developed JVP scale is low cost and easy to build at any resource-limited settings. This would be an adjunct tool for bedside cardiovascular examination of patients with good to excellent reliability. This would also be used for teaching cardiovascular physiology for medical and allied science students.","PeriodicalId":31371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology","volume":"9 1","pages":"61 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCPC.JCPC_4_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Noninvasively jugular venous pressure (JVP) is measured at bedside commonly by card and ruler. New tools have been developed for the measurement of JVP with the basis of this method. However, these tools have some limitations. Aim: The aim of this study was (1) to develop a JVP scale which would be devoid of common problems faced with currently available devices and (2) to test the provisional validity and reliability of the device in the estimation of JVP. Materials and Methods: We used two common plastic rulers – one as vertical and one as horizontal. The vertical ruler was cut at the level of 5 cm mark. A piece of aluminum sheet was used to make an adapter in which the vertical ruler can slide. This adapter was attached to the horizontal ruler. Both the rulers were equipped with spirit-level capsules. This device was used by 16 raters to measure JVP on five individuals twice. Inter-rater, intra-rater, and test–retest reliability were checked by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 20 software package. Results: For average measures, inter-rater ICC was 0.998 (P < 0.001), intra-rater ICC was 0.981 (P < 0.001), and test–retest ICC was 0.829 (P = 0.001). Inter- and intra-rater reliability was “excellent,” whereas test–retest reliability was “good.” Conclusions: Developed JVP scale is low cost and easy to build at any resource-limited settings. This would be an adjunct tool for bedside cardiovascular examination of patients with good to excellent reliability. This would also be used for teaching cardiovascular physiology for medical and allied science students.
颈静脉压力表在心血管临床检查中的可靠性
背景:非侵入性颈静脉压(JVP)通常在床边用卡尺测量。在这种方法的基础上,开发了新的JVP测量工具。然而,这些工具有一些局限性。目的:本研究的目的是(1)开发一种JVP量表,该量表将没有当前可用设备面临的常见问题;(2)测试该设备在JVP估计中的临时有效性和可靠性。材料和方法:我们使用了两个常见的塑料尺子——一个垂直,一个水平。竖尺是在5厘米标记的水平上切割的。一块铝板被用来制作一个适配器,垂直标尺可以在其中滑动。这个适配器连接到水平尺上。两把尺子都装有水平仪。16名评分者使用该设备对5名受试者的JVP进行了两次测量。通过IBM®SPSS®Statistics Version 20软件包中的组内相关系数(ICC)检查评分者之间、评分者内部和测试-再测试的可靠性。结果:对于平均测量,评分者间ICC为0.998(P<0.001),评分者内ICC为0.981(P<001),测试-再测试ICC为0.829(P=0.001)。评分者间和评分者内的可靠性“极好”,而测试-再测的可靠性“良好”。结论:开发的JVP量表成本低,在任何资源有限的情况下都易于构建。这将是对患者进行床边心血管检查的辅助工具,具有良好到极好的可靠性。这也将用于医学和相关科学学生的心血管生理学教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书