Pode o Juiz Impedir (ou Restringir) o Uso das Algemas?

Q4 Social Sciences
Kelen Christine do Nascimento Souza
{"title":"Pode o Juiz Impedir (ou Restringir) o Uso das Algemas?","authors":"Kelen Christine do Nascimento Souza","doi":"10.31412/rbcp.v11i2.574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text seeks to analyze what led to the issuance of the Binding Opinion 11, of the Federal Supreme Court, operational aspects that guide the use of handcuffs and the losses resulting from judicial decisions that limit the use of the instrument, with an exposition of favorable and contrary understandings to use of handcuffs. The objective is to prove that the use of the instrument should be mandatory, not an exception, in view of the innumerable reactions that an individual may have when he is arrested and his effectiveness in reducing injuries and deaths.","PeriodicalId":31855,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Policiais","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Policiais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31412/rbcp.v11i2.574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text seeks to analyze what led to the issuance of the Binding Opinion 11, of the Federal Supreme Court, operational aspects that guide the use of handcuffs and the losses resulting from judicial decisions that limit the use of the instrument, with an exposition of favorable and contrary understandings to use of handcuffs. The objective is to prove that the use of the instrument should be mandatory, not an exception, in view of the innumerable reactions that an individual may have when he is arrested and his effectiveness in reducing injuries and deaths.
法官能阻止(或限制)手铐的使用吗?
本文试图分析导致联邦最高法院发布具有约束力的第11号意见的原因、指导使用手铐的操作方面以及限制使用该文书的司法决定所造成的损失,并阐述对使用手铐的有利和相反的理解。其目的是要证明,鉴于个人被捕时可能产生的无数反应以及该工具在减少伤亡方面的有效性,该工具的使用应是强制性的,而不是例外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信