‘Meanders of [the] Purple Flood’: Blood and Bloodletting in Eighteenth-Century Literature and Medicine

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Heather Meek
{"title":"‘Meanders of [the] Purple Flood’: Blood and Bloodletting in Eighteenth-Century Literature and Medicine","authors":"Heather Meek","doi":"10.1111/1754-0208.12872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay considers understandings and representations of blood and bloodletting in a range of eighteenth-century medical and literary texts. Reflecting a historical moment of complex and uneven transition, these texts present models of blood that are variously orthodox, idiosyncratic, and imaginative. Representations of bloodletting, in particular, show doctors and laypeople, including women, contesting, welcoming, and orchestrating the therapy, which could both injure and soothe. Taken together, the texts this essay explores reinforce, refute, and enlarge humoral, mechanist, rational–empirical, vitalist, and other master paradigms, commonly conceiving body, mind, spirit, and earth as intricately connected and illustrating how medical ideas in this period were formed not merely through the consensus of an elite group of male authorities but also through the co-existence of a range of variable, oftentimes conflicting, theories; through dissent and debate; through the voices of non-experts; and through a reliance on the creative imagination.</p>","PeriodicalId":55946,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"41-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay considers understandings and representations of blood and bloodletting in a range of eighteenth-century medical and literary texts. Reflecting a historical moment of complex and uneven transition, these texts present models of blood that are variously orthodox, idiosyncratic, and imaginative. Representations of bloodletting, in particular, show doctors and laypeople, including women, contesting, welcoming, and orchestrating the therapy, which could both injure and soothe. Taken together, the texts this essay explores reinforce, refute, and enlarge humoral, mechanist, rational–empirical, vitalist, and other master paradigms, commonly conceiving body, mind, spirit, and earth as intricately connected and illustrating how medical ideas in this period were formed not merely through the consensus of an elite group of male authorities but also through the co-existence of a range of variable, oftentimes conflicting, theories; through dissent and debate; through the voices of non-experts; and through a reliance on the creative imagination.

“紫色洪水的曲折”:18世纪文学和医学中的血液和放血
这篇文章考虑的理解和代表的血和放血在一系列十八世纪的医学和文学文本。这些文本反映了复杂和不平衡过渡的历史时刻,呈现了各种正统,特质和富有想象力的血液模型。特别是放血的表现,表现了医生和非专业人士,包括妇女,对这种既能造成伤害又能缓解疼痛的疗法表示异议、欢迎和精心安排。综上所述,本文探讨的文本强化、驳斥和扩大了体液论、机械论、理性-经验论、活力论和其他主要范式,通常将身体、思想、精神和地球视为错综复杂的联系,并说明了这一时期的医学思想是如何形成的,不仅是通过男性权威精英群体的共识,而且是通过一系列可变的、经常相互冲突的理论的共存;通过异议和辩论;通过非专家的声音;依靠创造性的想象力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信