Pico della Mirandola on the Dignity of Man and Some Contemporary Echoes of His Philosophy

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Clotho Pub Date : 2020-12-18 DOI:10.4312/clotho.2.2.59-72
Marko Uršič
{"title":"Pico della Mirandola on the Dignity of Man and Some Contemporary Echoes of His Philosophy","authors":"Marko Uršič","doi":"10.4312/clotho.2.2.59-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Oration on the Dignity of Man makes a claim, characteristic for the Renaissance, that the dignity of man, the real “excellency of human nature,” is not present in any specific human quality or ability. Neither is it present in the role of the human soul as the “tie of the world” (copula mundi), as Marsilio Ficino has taught. Even higher than this eminent human role in the world is the freedom of man to choose his role and task himself. At the same time, Pico believes that Man was created as the image of God, in the sense that no man is determined in advance: human free will reflects God’s free will in creation. From the point of view of the mainstream modern dualism, this is a paradox, even a contradiction. This paper argues the opposite: that the human free will is even nowadays, not less than in the Renaissance period, compatible with the belief in God. However, this is only the case if God (being transcendent or immanent to the world) does not command anything, if God does not demand anything – except love. Violence and killing are eo ipso prohibited, especially in the name of faith. Therefore, freedom and faith are perfectly compatible. Even more, modern humans are fatally unfree either in the secular “radicalization” of faith or in the atheistic secularization of the world. Unfree due to their existence (Dasein), enslaved by the Angst of “mere nothing.”","PeriodicalId":33790,"journal":{"name":"Clotho","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clotho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/clotho.2.2.59-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Oration on the Dignity of Man makes a claim, characteristic for the Renaissance, that the dignity of man, the real “excellency of human nature,” is not present in any specific human quality or ability. Neither is it present in the role of the human soul as the “tie of the world” (copula mundi), as Marsilio Ficino has taught. Even higher than this eminent human role in the world is the freedom of man to choose his role and task himself. At the same time, Pico believes that Man was created as the image of God, in the sense that no man is determined in advance: human free will reflects God’s free will in creation. From the point of view of the mainstream modern dualism, this is a paradox, even a contradiction. This paper argues the opposite: that the human free will is even nowadays, not less than in the Renaissance period, compatible with the belief in God. However, this is only the case if God (being transcendent or immanent to the world) does not command anything, if God does not demand anything – except love. Violence and killing are eo ipso prohibited, especially in the name of faith. Therefore, freedom and faith are perfectly compatible. Even more, modern humans are fatally unfree either in the secular “radicalization” of faith or in the atheistic secularization of the world. Unfree due to their existence (Dasein), enslaved by the Angst of “mere nothing.”
皮科·德拉·米兰多拉论人的尊严及其哲学的当代回响
《论人的尊严》提出了一个文艺复兴时期的主张,即人的尊严,即真正的“人性的卓越”,并不存在于任何特定的人类品质或能力中。它也不存在于人类灵魂作为“世界纽带”(copula mundi)的角色中,正如马西利奥·菲西诺(Marsilio Ficino)所教导的那样。比人类在世界上的这种杰出角色更高的,是人类自己选择角色和任务的自由。同时,皮科认为人是按照上帝的形象被创造出来的,从某种意义上说,没有人是预先被决定的:人的自由意志反映了上帝在创造中的自由意志。从现代二元论的主流观点来看,这是一个悖论,甚至是一个矛盾。本文提出了相反的观点:即使在今天,人类的自由意志也不亚于文艺复兴时期,与对上帝的信仰是相容的。然而,只有当上帝(对世界来说是超然的或内在的)不命令任何东西,如果上帝不要求任何东西——除了爱——时,情况才会如此。暴力和杀戮绝对被禁止,尤其是以信仰的名义。因此,自由和信仰是完全相容的。更重要的是,无论是在信仰的世俗“激进化”还是在世界的无神论世俗化方面,现代人都是致命的不自由。由于他们的存在而不自由,被“虚无”的焦虑所奴役。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信