ANALYSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS CLINICAL PATHWAYS IMPLEMENTATION IN ROYAL PRIMA MEDAN GENERAL HOSPITAL YEAR 2020

Alexander Angkasa, E. Girsang, A. N. Nasution, A. Khu, Sri Lestari Ramadhani Nasution
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS CLINICAL PATHWAYS IMPLEMENTATION IN ROYAL PRIMA MEDAN GENERAL HOSPITAL YEAR 2020","authors":"Alexander Angkasa, E. Girsang, A. N. Nasution, A. Khu, Sri Lestari Ramadhani Nasution","doi":"10.20473/ijph.v17i2.2022.219-229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introdution: Clinical pathway (CP) is a disease management tool used to reduce unnecessary variations in services, increase clinical outcomes, and control resources. Acute appendicitis is one cause of acute abdominal pain, where cases of appendix perforation range from 20-30% increasing to 32-72% at the age of more than 60. Methods: This research was conducted using mix method with case study design. Qualitative data were taken by interview and observation. Quantitative data were taken with a simple description from the acute appendicitis CP documentation in medical records and ICPAT (January - September 2020, n = 117). Result: According to the result of the research, the level of completeness for CP was 100% and form filling was 85%. Conclusion: ICPAT dimension 1 made sure that the form was the clinical pathway. The content and quality were good, and dimension 2 assesses the CP documentation process. The content is lacking and the quality is moderate, dimension 3 assess the CP development process which content was good, and quality was moderate, and dimension 4 assesses the CP implementation process. The content was moderate, and the quality was good. Dimension 5 is to assess the maintenance of clinical pathways in which content was lacking and quality was moderate. Dimension 6 serves to assess the role of the organization that content was good and quality was moderate where the obstacles were due to lack of understanding and time constraints.","PeriodicalId":33636,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijph.v17i2.2022.219-229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introdution: Clinical pathway (CP) is a disease management tool used to reduce unnecessary variations in services, increase clinical outcomes, and control resources. Acute appendicitis is one cause of acute abdominal pain, where cases of appendix perforation range from 20-30% increasing to 32-72% at the age of more than 60. Methods: This research was conducted using mix method with case study design. Qualitative data were taken by interview and observation. Quantitative data were taken with a simple description from the acute appendicitis CP documentation in medical records and ICPAT (January - September 2020, n = 117). Result: According to the result of the research, the level of completeness for CP was 100% and form filling was 85%. Conclusion: ICPAT dimension 1 made sure that the form was the clinical pathway. The content and quality were good, and dimension 2 assesses the CP documentation process. The content is lacking and the quality is moderate, dimension 3 assess the CP development process which content was good, and quality was moderate, and dimension 4 assesses the CP implementation process. The content was moderate, and the quality was good. Dimension 5 is to assess the maintenance of clinical pathways in which content was lacking and quality was moderate. Dimension 6 serves to assess the role of the organization that content was good and quality was moderate where the obstacles were due to lack of understanding and time constraints.
皇家初级综合医院2020年急性阑尾炎临床路径实施分析
简介:临床路径(CP)是一种疾病管理工具,用于减少服务中不必要的变化,增加临床结果,并控制资源。急性阑尾炎是引起急性腹痛的原因之一,阑尾穿孔的病例从20-30%增加到60岁以上的32-72%不等。方法:本研究采用混合法和案例研究设计相结合的方法。通过访谈和观察获得定性数据。定量数据取自医疗记录和ICPAT中急性阑尾炎CP文件的简单描述(2020年1-9月,n=117)。结果:根据研究结果,CP的完整性水平为100%,表单填写率为85%。结论:ICPAT维度1确定了该形式为临床路径。内容和质量都很好,维度2评估了CP文件编制过程。内容缺乏,质量适中,维度3评估CP开发过程,内容良好,质量适中;维度4评估CP实施过程。含量适中,质量良好。维度5是评估内容缺乏、质量中等的临床途径的维持情况。维度6用于评估组织的作用,即内容良好,质量适中,而障碍是由于缺乏理解和时间限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书