The Value of Urinary RBP4 in The Diagnosis of FSGS and other Renal Diseases.

K. Marek-Bukowiec, A. Konieczny, K. Ratajczyk, K. Macur, P. Czaplewska, A. Czyżewska-Buczyńska, P. Kowal, W. Witkiewicz
{"title":"The Value of Urinary RBP4 in The Diagnosis of FSGS and other Renal Diseases.","authors":"K. Marek-Bukowiec, A. Konieczny, K. Ratajczyk, K. Macur, P. Czaplewska, A. Czyżewska-Buczyńska, P. Kowal, W. Witkiewicz","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-35997/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n BackgroundUnequivocal diagnosis of FSGS can only be made with a renal biopsy, which is an invasive, risk-associated medical procedure. The discovery of non-invasive molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis of FSGS remains an important scientific goal. This study examines the urinary proteome of FSGS patients and reference groups, in order to identify urinary protein expression alterations indicative of FSGS. Methods Urine samples were collected from subjects representing FSGS, IgA nephropathy (IgAN), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), and healthy control group, respectively. The samples were subjected to SWATH-MS proteomics analysis. ELISA was utilized to validate the expression level of Retinol-binding protein 4 (uRBP4) in FSGS and reference samples (IgAN, ccRCC, chRCC, prostate cancer and healthy subjects).ResultsThe MS study identified 194 (FSGS), 179 (IgAN), 271 (ccRCC), 255 (chRCC), and 275 (healthy controls) urinary proteins. The comparative proteomic analysis revealed that urinary Retinol-binding protein 4 (uRBP4) clearly discriminates FSGS from the rest of the groups. Increased levels of uRBP4 in FSGS urine specimens were also evidenced by ELISA. Significantly elevated levels of uRBP4 were also observed for IgAN, ccRCC and chRCC versus healthy individuals. ConclusionsDetermining FSGS diagnosis based on uRBP4 expression alone is not possible. Specific uRBP4 concentration cut-off can be applied to accurately distinguish individuals with renal disorder (in general) from healthy subjects. Possibly, urinary RBP4 could serve as a screening biomarker identifying people at risk of renal disorders, who should undergo more detailed diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":75256,"journal":{"name":"Trends in biomedical research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-35997/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BackgroundUnequivocal diagnosis of FSGS can only be made with a renal biopsy, which is an invasive, risk-associated medical procedure. The discovery of non-invasive molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis of FSGS remains an important scientific goal. This study examines the urinary proteome of FSGS patients and reference groups, in order to identify urinary protein expression alterations indicative of FSGS. Methods Urine samples were collected from subjects representing FSGS, IgA nephropathy (IgAN), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), and healthy control group, respectively. The samples were subjected to SWATH-MS proteomics analysis. ELISA was utilized to validate the expression level of Retinol-binding protein 4 (uRBP4) in FSGS and reference samples (IgAN, ccRCC, chRCC, prostate cancer and healthy subjects).ResultsThe MS study identified 194 (FSGS), 179 (IgAN), 271 (ccRCC), 255 (chRCC), and 275 (healthy controls) urinary proteins. The comparative proteomic analysis revealed that urinary Retinol-binding protein 4 (uRBP4) clearly discriminates FSGS from the rest of the groups. Increased levels of uRBP4 in FSGS urine specimens were also evidenced by ELISA. Significantly elevated levels of uRBP4 were also observed for IgAN, ccRCC and chRCC versus healthy individuals. ConclusionsDetermining FSGS diagnosis based on uRBP4 expression alone is not possible. Specific uRBP4 concentration cut-off can be applied to accurately distinguish individuals with renal disorder (in general) from healthy subjects. Possibly, urinary RBP4 could serve as a screening biomarker identifying people at risk of renal disorders, who should undergo more detailed diagnostics.
尿RBP4在FSGS及其他肾脏疾病诊断中的价值
背景:FSGS的明确诊断只能通过肾脏活检来进行,这是一种侵入性的、有风险的医疗程序。发现诊断FSGS的非侵入性分子生物标志物仍然是一个重要的科学目标。本研究检测了FSGS患者和参照组的尿蛋白质组,以确定FSGS患者的尿蛋白表达改变。方法分别采集FSGS、IgA肾病(IgAN)、透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)、憎色肾细胞癌(chRCC)和健康对照组患者的尿液。样品进行SWATH-MS蛋白质组学分析。采用ELISA法验证视黄醇结合蛋白4 (retinol binding protein 4, uRBP4)在FSGS和参考样本(IgAN、ccRCC、chRCC、前列腺癌和健康人)中的表达水平。结果MS共鉴定出194个(FSGS)、179个(IgAN)、271个(ccRCC)、255个(chRCC)和275个(健康对照)尿蛋白。比较蛋白质组学分析显示,尿视黄醇结合蛋白4 (uRBP4)明显区分FSGS与其他组。ELISA也证实了FSGS尿液样本中uRBP4水平升高。与健康个体相比,IgAN、ccRCC和chRCC组的uRBP4水平也显著升高。结论单纯根据uRBP4表达判断FSGS诊断是不可能的。特异的uRBP4浓度临界值可用于准确区分肾脏疾病个体(一般情况下)和健康受试者。可能,尿RBP4可以作为一种筛选生物标志物,识别有肾脏疾病风险的人,这些人应该接受更详细的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信