Vanishing Point: Chadwick Boseman’s Body and the Still Image

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Ashley Hendricks
{"title":"Vanishing Point: Chadwick Boseman’s Body and the Still Image","authors":"Ashley Hendricks","doi":"10.2979/blackcamera.14.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The desire to read Chadwick Boseman’s body of work in a traditionally representational way is already complicated—in an interview with The Atlantic, Spike Lee describes his casting choice of Boseman in Da 5 Bloods: “Here’s the thing for me. This character is heroic; he’s a superhero. Who do we cast? We cast Jackie Robinson, James Brown, Thurgood Marshall, and we cast T’Challa. Chad is a superhero! That character is Christlike!” The conflation of Boseman’s body with these iconic figures moves beyond simply reading the image as representational specifically beside analysis of temporality. Lee’s film was released streaming in June of 2020, the same month that saw significant numbers of protesters supporting the Black Lives Matter movement, four months into a national response to a pandemic, and three and a half years into what felt like a never-ending presidential term. The narrative of the film takes this into account; it acknowledges the Black Lives Matter Movement and slides a notable side-eye to the Trump presidency. The film is timely, cutting, and grounded contextually in the here and now and significant for what it discloses, however, this paper is focused on how the still images which ground the film complicate the possibility of any full disclosure, and any clear, uncomplicated representation due to a collapse, leverage, and slippage of time. The question at the center of this analysis is: under what temporal circumstances does Boseman’s body have a chance in its ability to live up to (or perhaps trouble) over-representation? What must happen to give the body voice? This paper relies heavily on aesthetic interventions into race and visuality as posed by Alessandra Raengo, Grant Farred, and Fred Moten as well as the discussions of indexicality put forth first by Roland Barthes and deconstructed by Shawn Michelle Smith.","PeriodicalId":42749,"journal":{"name":"Black Camera","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Camera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/blackcamera.14.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The desire to read Chadwick Boseman’s body of work in a traditionally representational way is already complicated—in an interview with The Atlantic, Spike Lee describes his casting choice of Boseman in Da 5 Bloods: “Here’s the thing for me. This character is heroic; he’s a superhero. Who do we cast? We cast Jackie Robinson, James Brown, Thurgood Marshall, and we cast T’Challa. Chad is a superhero! That character is Christlike!” The conflation of Boseman’s body with these iconic figures moves beyond simply reading the image as representational specifically beside analysis of temporality. Lee’s film was released streaming in June of 2020, the same month that saw significant numbers of protesters supporting the Black Lives Matter movement, four months into a national response to a pandemic, and three and a half years into what felt like a never-ending presidential term. The narrative of the film takes this into account; it acknowledges the Black Lives Matter Movement and slides a notable side-eye to the Trump presidency. The film is timely, cutting, and grounded contextually in the here and now and significant for what it discloses, however, this paper is focused on how the still images which ground the film complicate the possibility of any full disclosure, and any clear, uncomplicated representation due to a collapse, leverage, and slippage of time. The question at the center of this analysis is: under what temporal circumstances does Boseman’s body have a chance in its ability to live up to (or perhaps trouble) over-representation? What must happen to give the body voice? This paper relies heavily on aesthetic interventions into race and visuality as posed by Alessandra Raengo, Grant Farred, and Fred Moten as well as the discussions of indexicality put forth first by Roland Barthes and deconstructed by Shawn Michelle Smith.
消失点:查德威克·博斯曼的身体与静止影像
摘要:以传统的具象方式阅读查德威克·博斯曼作品的愿望已经很复杂了——在接受《大西洋月刊》采访时,斯派克·李描述了他在《Da 5 Bloods》中对博斯曼的选角:“这是我的选择。这个角色是英雄的;他是个超级英雄。我们选谁?我们选了杰基·罗宾逊,詹姆斯·布朗,瑟古德·马歇尔,还有T·查拉。查德是个超级英雄!那个角色就像基督!”博斯曼的身体与这些标志性人物的融合超越了简单地将图像解读为具象,特别是在分析时间性的基础上。李的电影于2020年6月在流媒体上发布,同月,大批抗议者支持“黑人的命也是命”运动,全国应对疫情四个月后,以及感觉永无止境的总统任期三年半后。电影的叙事考虑到了这一点;它承认了“黑人的命也是命”运动,并对特朗普的总统任期投下了引人注目的侧目。这部电影是及时的、剪切的、基于此时此地的背景,对它所揭示的内容意义重大,然而,本文关注的是,作为电影基础的静止图像如何使任何全面披露的可能性以及任何清晰、简单的表现因时间的崩溃、杠杆作用和滑动而变得复杂。这一分析的核心问题是:在什么样的时间环境下,博斯曼的身体有机会达到(或可能遇到麻烦)过度表征?必须采取什么措施才能让身体发出声音?本文在很大程度上依赖于Alessandra Raengo、Grant Farred和Fred Moten对种族和视觉的美学干预,以及Roland Barthes首先提出并由Shawn Michelle Smith解构的关于指数性的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Black Camera
Black Camera FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信