{"title":"Unemployment in the Affective Economy: Exploring the Affective Governing of Young Unemployed People in the Danish Welfare State","authors":"Sabina Pultz","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2020-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This case study investigates the affective governing of young unemployed people, and it concludes that getting money in the Danish welfare state comes with an “affective price”. In the quest for a job, unemployed people have been increasingly responsibilized in order to live up to the ideal of the active jobseeker. Consequently, when faced with unemployment, they are encouraged to work harder on themselves and their motivation. Based on an interview study with young unemployed people (N=39) and field observations made at employment fund agencies in Denmark (2014–15), I explore how young unemployed people are governed by and through their emotions. By supplementing governmentality studies (Foucault et al. 1988, 2010) with the concept of “affective economy” from Ahmed (2014), I discuss how young unemployed people who receive money from the Danish state are placed in a situation of debt. The paper unfolds how this debt becomes visible as the unemployed people often describe feeling under suspicion for not doing enough, for not being motivated enough. Through an abundance of (pro) activity, they have to prove the suspicion of being lazy wrong, and through managing themselves as active jobseekers, they earn the right to get money from the state. Here motivation, passion and empowerment are key currencies. I discuss the intricate interplay between monetary and affective currencies as well as political implications in the context of the Danish welfare. The article contributes by making visible the importance of taking affective matters into account when investigating the complex relationship between politics and psychology.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"66 1","pages":"335 - 361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zsr-2020-0015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2020-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This case study investigates the affective governing of young unemployed people, and it concludes that getting money in the Danish welfare state comes with an “affective price”. In the quest for a job, unemployed people have been increasingly responsibilized in order to live up to the ideal of the active jobseeker. Consequently, when faced with unemployment, they are encouraged to work harder on themselves and their motivation. Based on an interview study with young unemployed people (N=39) and field observations made at employment fund agencies in Denmark (2014–15), I explore how young unemployed people are governed by and through their emotions. By supplementing governmentality studies (Foucault et al. 1988, 2010) with the concept of “affective economy” from Ahmed (2014), I discuss how young unemployed people who receive money from the Danish state are placed in a situation of debt. The paper unfolds how this debt becomes visible as the unemployed people often describe feeling under suspicion for not doing enough, for not being motivated enough. Through an abundance of (pro) activity, they have to prove the suspicion of being lazy wrong, and through managing themselves as active jobseekers, they earn the right to get money from the state. Here motivation, passion and empowerment are key currencies. I discuss the intricate interplay between monetary and affective currencies as well as political implications in the context of the Danish welfare. The article contributes by making visible the importance of taking affective matters into account when investigating the complex relationship between politics and psychology.
本案例研究考察了青年失业人员的情感控制,并得出结论:在丹麦的福利国家中获得资金是有“情感价格”的。在找工作的过程中,失业的人越来越有责任感,以达到积极求职者的理想。因此,当面临失业时,他们被鼓励更加努力地工作。基于对青年失业人员的访谈研究(N=39)和在丹麦就业基金机构的实地观察(2014-15),我探讨了青年失业人员是如何被他们的情绪所支配和通过他们的情绪。通过用Ahmed(2014)的“情感经济”概念补充治理学研究(Foucault et al. 1988, 2010),我讨论了从丹麦国家获得资金的年轻失业人员是如何处于债务状态的。这篇论文揭示了这种债务是如何变得明显的,因为失业者经常描述自己感到被怀疑做得不够,没有足够的动力。通过大量的(亲)活动,他们必须证明懒惰的怀疑是错误的,并通过管理自己作为积极的求职者,他们获得了从国家获得资金的权利。在这里,动力、激情和授权是关键货币。我讨论了货币和情感货币之间错综复杂的相互作用,以及丹麦福利背景下的政治影响。这篇文章的贡献在于表明,在研究政治与心理之间的复杂关系时,考虑情感问题的重要性。