Taxation of property given into dependent possession by an entity subject to a property tax exemption

Q3 Social Sciences
Edyta Jóźwiak
{"title":"Taxation of property given into dependent possession by an entity subject to a property tax exemption","authors":"Edyta Jóźwiak","doi":"10.31648/aspal.7072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motives: Does the real property owned by an entity subject to the real property tax exemption and placed in the dependent possession of another entity give rise to an obligation to pay the tax in the amount payable by the entrepreneur?Aim: In a situation where the property is in the possession of the entrepreneur, he is obliged to pay the highest amount of tax – in 2021, the rate of this tax is PLN 24, PLN 84 per m2. However, the Act on Local and Duties and Fees provides for certain exceptions for entities which, due to their activities, benefit from a tax exemption, because of which no funds are credited to the budget of a local government unit. Therefore, it can be concluded that the tax authorities want the largest possible number of properties to be taxed in the highest amount. Their task is facilitated by the fact that the provisions of tax law are not clear as to the definition of “seizure of real estate for conducting business activity”, which allows the tax authorities to freely decide what such activity is and what is not. Recently, an opinion has developed that the mere transfer of real estate into dependent possession based on a civil law contract justifies the statement that the entity conducts business activity. Therefore, the article in question attempts to answer the question whether, and if so, in what amount, the entity that benefits from the tax exemption is obliged to pay tax if it gives the property into dependent possession, and whether it is possible to use tax optimization and make the division of real estate for tax purposes?Results: The interpretation of the provisions of a.l.t. applied by the tax authorities to date, which boils down to the assumption that the mere fact of leasing real estate proves that business activity is being conducted and prejudges the loss of acquired right to tax exemption, is not justified in any way. In the provisions of the a.l.t., the legislator clearly indicates that the subjective use of the real property for purposes that entitle the entity to use the tax exemption is of significance. At the same time, when the tax exemption does not extend to part of the property, it is possible to subdivide it for tax optimisation purposes.","PeriodicalId":36893,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Administratio Locorum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Administratio Locorum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.7072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motives: Does the real property owned by an entity subject to the real property tax exemption and placed in the dependent possession of another entity give rise to an obligation to pay the tax in the amount payable by the entrepreneur?Aim: In a situation where the property is in the possession of the entrepreneur, he is obliged to pay the highest amount of tax – in 2021, the rate of this tax is PLN 24, PLN 84 per m2. However, the Act on Local and Duties and Fees provides for certain exceptions for entities which, due to their activities, benefit from a tax exemption, because of which no funds are credited to the budget of a local government unit. Therefore, it can be concluded that the tax authorities want the largest possible number of properties to be taxed in the highest amount. Their task is facilitated by the fact that the provisions of tax law are not clear as to the definition of “seizure of real estate for conducting business activity”, which allows the tax authorities to freely decide what such activity is and what is not. Recently, an opinion has developed that the mere transfer of real estate into dependent possession based on a civil law contract justifies the statement that the entity conducts business activity. Therefore, the article in question attempts to answer the question whether, and if so, in what amount, the entity that benefits from the tax exemption is obliged to pay tax if it gives the property into dependent possession, and whether it is possible to use tax optimization and make the division of real estate for tax purposes?Results: The interpretation of the provisions of a.l.t. applied by the tax authorities to date, which boils down to the assumption that the mere fact of leasing real estate proves that business activity is being conducted and prejudges the loss of acquired right to tax exemption, is not justified in any way. In the provisions of the a.l.t., the legislator clearly indicates that the subjective use of the real property for purposes that entitle the entity to use the tax exemption is of significance. At the same time, when the tax exemption does not extend to part of the property, it is possible to subdivide it for tax optimisation purposes.
对享有财产税豁免的实体所拥有的财产征税
动机:受不动产税豁免约束的实体拥有的不动产,并由另一个实体独立拥有,是否会产生支付企业家应付税款的义务?目标:在财产归企业家所有的情况下,他有义务支付最高的税款——2021年,该税的税率为每平方米24、84兹罗提。然而,《地方和关税及费用法》为因其活动而受益于免税的实体规定了某些例外情况,因此没有资金记入地方政府单位的预算。因此,可以得出结论,税务机关希望以最高的金额对尽可能多的财产征税。税法条款对“为进行商业活动而扣押房地产”的定义并不明确,这使得税务机关可以自由决定什么是此类活动,什么不是此类活动,这为他们的任务提供了便利。最近,有一种意见认为,仅仅根据民法合同将不动产转让为从属财产,就可以证明该实体从事商业活动的说法是正当的。因此,这篇文章试图回答这样一个问题:如果免税,受益于免税的实体将财产归为从属财产,是否有义务纳税,如果有,纳税金额是多少,以及是否有可能利用税收优化和出于税收目的划分不动产?结果:税务机关对迄今为止适用的a.l.t.条款的解释,归结为仅仅租赁房地产的事实就证明正在进行商业活动,并预先判断所获得的免税权的丧失,这在任何方面都是不合理的。在a.l.t.的规定中,立法者明确指出,将不动产主观用于使实体有权使用免税的目的具有重要意义。同时,当免税不延伸到部分财产时,可以出于税收优化目的对其进行细分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信