Study on the Case of Songdo Smart City based on the Citizen Participation Approach

Q2 Social Sciences
Myung-Hee Kim
{"title":"Study on the Case of Songdo Smart City based on the Citizen Participation Approach","authors":"Myung-Hee Kim","doi":"10.14704/web/v19i1/web19312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to explore the level of citizen participation in Songdo smart city project, once called U-city project, in order to provide citizens with U-service anywhere by using new IT technology in the Incheon Free Economic Zone, a landfill site. To this end, it reviews the literature on smart city, and derives project’s problems, evaluates according to the framework, and proposes implications. This paper uses the “Citizen Participation Evaluation Framework” formalized by Simonofsky and his colleagues and analyzes civic participation method by dividing it into democratic participants, co-creators, and ICT users. The level of citizen participation in the Songdo project is evaluated according to the criteria presented by this framework and the results are presented. The analysis period is from 2003 to 2016, when the government office was opened and the initial foundation was completed. As a result of analysis, Songdo had built open data and infrastructure for citizens, but citizens were participated as ICT users only. Although citizens living in smart cities should be the co-creators and participants in democratic decision-making for solving urban problems, Songdo was missing these factors. In conclusion, this paper argues that Songdo remains in the U-city paradigm as the 'smart people', a key element among the smart city components, has been neglected and ultimately reveals a fundamental limit to its growth into a sustainable smart city. In addition, suggestions for improvement are presented. This paper is meaningful in that it presented lessons and implications that the human factors should be emphasized as the subject of technology and services to develop into an authentic smart city through the case of Songdo.","PeriodicalId":35441,"journal":{"name":"Webology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Webology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v19i1/web19312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the level of citizen participation in Songdo smart city project, once called U-city project, in order to provide citizens with U-service anywhere by using new IT technology in the Incheon Free Economic Zone, a landfill site. To this end, it reviews the literature on smart city, and derives project’s problems, evaluates according to the framework, and proposes implications. This paper uses the “Citizen Participation Evaluation Framework” formalized by Simonofsky and his colleagues and analyzes civic participation method by dividing it into democratic participants, co-creators, and ICT users. The level of citizen participation in the Songdo project is evaluated according to the criteria presented by this framework and the results are presented. The analysis period is from 2003 to 2016, when the government office was opened and the initial foundation was completed. As a result of analysis, Songdo had built open data and infrastructure for citizens, but citizens were participated as ICT users only. Although citizens living in smart cities should be the co-creators and participants in democratic decision-making for solving urban problems, Songdo was missing these factors. In conclusion, this paper argues that Songdo remains in the U-city paradigm as the 'smart people', a key element among the smart city components, has been neglected and ultimately reveals a fundamental limit to its growth into a sustainable smart city. In addition, suggestions for improvement are presented. This paper is meaningful in that it presented lessons and implications that the human factors should be emphasized as the subject of technology and services to develop into an authentic smart city through the case of Songdo.
基于市民参与法的松岛智慧城市案例研究
本文的目的是探索松岛智慧城市项目(曾被称为U-city项目)中公民的参与水平,以便在仁川自由经济区(一个垃圾填埋场)利用新的IT技术为任何地方的公民提供U-服务。为此,对智慧城市的相关文献进行了回顾,得出了项目存在的问题,并根据框架进行了评价,提出了启示。本文采用Simonofsky及其同事提出的“公民参与评估框架”,将公民参与方法分为民主参与者、共同创造者和信息通信技术用户。根据该框架提出的标准对松岛项目的公民参与程度进行了评估,并给出了结果。分析期为2003年至2016年,政府办公楼启用,初期基础建设完成。分析的结果是,松岛为公民建立了开放的数据和基础设施,但公民只是作为信息和通信技术用户参与其中。尽管生活在智慧城市中的公民应该是解决城市问题的民主决策的共同创造者和参与者,但松多却忽略了这些因素。总之,本文认为松岛仍然处于U-city范式中,因为作为智能城市组成部分中的一个关键元素的“智能人”被忽视了,并最终揭示了其发展成为可持续智能城市的根本限制。此外,还提出了改进建议。本文的意义在于,它通过松岛的案例,提出了作为技术和服务主体应强调人的因素,以发展成为一个真正的智慧城市的经验教训和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Webology
Webology Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
自引率
0.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Webology is an international peer-reviewed journal in English devoted to the field of the World Wide Web and serves as a forum for discussion and experimentation. It serves as a forum for new research in information dissemination and communication processes in general, and in the context of the World Wide Web in particular. Concerns include the production, gathering, recording, processing, storing, representing, sharing, transmitting, retrieving, distribution, and dissemination of information, as well as its social and cultural impacts. There is a strong emphasis on the Web and new information technologies. Special topic issues are also often seen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信