Visualization of Electronic Health Record Data for Decision-Making in Diabetes and Congestive Heart Failure

ACI open Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1702213
S. Fischer, S. Fischer, S. Fischer, C. Safran, Krzysztof Z Gajos, A. Wright
{"title":"Visualization of Electronic Health Record Data for Decision-Making in Diabetes and Congestive Heart Failure","authors":"S. Fischer, S. Fischer, S. Fischer, C. Safran, Krzysztof Z Gajos, A. Wright","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1702213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The aim of this study is to study the impact of graphical representation of health record data on physician decision-making to inform the design of health information technology. Materials and Methods We conducted a within participants crossover design study using a simulated electronic health record (EHR) in which we presented cases with and without visualized data designed to highlight important clinical trends or relationships, followed by assessment of the impact on decision-making about next steps for patients with chronic diseases. We then asked whether trends were observed and about usability and satisfaction using validated usability questions and asked open-ended questions as well. Time to answer questions was also collected. Results Twenty-one primary care providers participated in the study, including five for testing only and sixteen for the full study. Questions about clinical assessment or next actions were answered correctly 55% of the time. Regarding objective trends in the data, participants described noticing the trends 85% of the time. Differences in noticing trends or difficulty level of questions were not statistically significant. Satisfaction with the tool was high and participants agreed strongly that it helped them make better decisions without adding to the time it took. Discussion The simulation allowed us to test the impact of a visualization on clinician practice in a realistic setting. Designers of EHRs should consider the ways information presentation can affect decision-making. Conclusion Testing visualization tools can be done in a clinically realistic context. Providers desire visualizations and believe that they help them make better and faster decisions.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1702213","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim of this study is to study the impact of graphical representation of health record data on physician decision-making to inform the design of health information technology. Materials and Methods We conducted a within participants crossover design study using a simulated electronic health record (EHR) in which we presented cases with and without visualized data designed to highlight important clinical trends or relationships, followed by assessment of the impact on decision-making about next steps for patients with chronic diseases. We then asked whether trends were observed and about usability and satisfaction using validated usability questions and asked open-ended questions as well. Time to answer questions was also collected. Results Twenty-one primary care providers participated in the study, including five for testing only and sixteen for the full study. Questions about clinical assessment or next actions were answered correctly 55% of the time. Regarding objective trends in the data, participants described noticing the trends 85% of the time. Differences in noticing trends or difficulty level of questions were not statistically significant. Satisfaction with the tool was high and participants agreed strongly that it helped them make better decisions without adding to the time it took. Discussion The simulation allowed us to test the impact of a visualization on clinician practice in a realistic setting. Designers of EHRs should consider the ways information presentation can affect decision-making. Conclusion Testing visualization tools can be done in a clinically realistic context. Providers desire visualizations and believe that they help them make better and faster decisions.
用于糖尿病和充血性心力衰竭决策的电子健康记录数据可视化
摘要目的研究病历数据图形化表达对医生决策的影响,为卫生信息技术设计提供参考。材料和方法我们使用模拟电子健康记录(EHR)进行了一项参与者内部交叉设计研究,其中我们展示了有和没有可视化数据的病例,旨在突出重要的临床趋势或关系,然后评估对慢性病患者下一步决策的影响。然后我们询问趋势是否被观察到,使用验证的可用性问题询问可用性和满意度,并询问开放式问题。还收集了回答问题的时间。结果21名初级保健提供者参与了研究,其中5名仅用于测试,16名用于完整研究。关于临床评估或下一步行动的问题,正确率为55%。关于数据中的客观趋势,参与者描述了85%的时间注意到趋势。在注意趋势或问题难度水平上的差异没有统计学意义。对这个工具的满意度很高,参与者强烈同意它帮助他们在不增加时间的情况下做出更好的决定。模拟使我们能够在现实环境中测试可视化对临床医生实践的影响。电子病历的设计者应该考虑信息呈现影响决策的方式。结论可视化测试工具可以在临床实际情况下完成。提供者渴望可视化,并相信可视化可以帮助他们做出更好、更快的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信