Comparative analysis of methods for batch correction in proteomics — a two-batch case

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Katerina Danko, Lavrentii Danilov, A. Malashicheva, A. Lobov
{"title":"Comparative analysis of methods for batch correction in proteomics — a two-batch case","authors":"Katerina Danko, Lavrentii Danilov, A. Malashicheva, A. Lobov","doi":"10.21638/spbu03.2023.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A proper study design is vital for life science. Any effects unrelated to the studied ones (batch effects) should be avoided. Still, it is not always possible to exclude all batch effects in a complicated omics study. Here we discuss an appropriate way for analysis of proteomics data with an enormous technical batch effect. We re-analyzed the published dataset (PXD032212) with two batches of samples analyzed in two different years. Each batch includes control and differentiated cells. Control and differentiated cells form separate clusters with 209 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Nevertheless, the differences between the batches were higher than between the cell types. Therefore, the analysis of only one of the batches gives 276 or 290 DEPs. Then we compared the efficiency of five methods for batch correction. ComBat was the most effective method for batch effect correction, and the analysis of the corrected dataset revealed 406 DEPs.","PeriodicalId":8998,"journal":{"name":"Biological Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2023.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A proper study design is vital for life science. Any effects unrelated to the studied ones (batch effects) should be avoided. Still, it is not always possible to exclude all batch effects in a complicated omics study. Here we discuss an appropriate way for analysis of proteomics data with an enormous technical batch effect. We re-analyzed the published dataset (PXD032212) with two batches of samples analyzed in two different years. Each batch includes control and differentiated cells. Control and differentiated cells form separate clusters with 209 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Nevertheless, the differences between the batches were higher than between the cell types. Therefore, the analysis of only one of the batches gives 276 or 290 DEPs. Then we compared the efficiency of five methods for batch correction. ComBat was the most effective method for batch effect correction, and the analysis of the corrected dataset revealed 406 DEPs.
蛋白质组学批量校正方法的比较分析-两批案例
正确的研究设计对生命科学至关重要。应避免任何与研究无关的效应(批效应)。然而,在复杂的组学研究中,排除所有批次效应并不总是可能的。本文讨论了一种具有巨大技术批量效应的蛋白质组学数据分析方法。我们用两个不同年份的两批样本重新分析了已发表的数据集(PXD032212)。每批包括对照细胞和分化细胞。对照细胞和分化细胞形成独立的簇,有209个差异表达蛋白(dep)。然而,批次之间的差异大于细胞类型之间的差异。因此,仅对其中一个批次的分析就得到276或290个dep。然后比较了5种批量校正方法的效率。战斗是最有效的批量效果校正方法,对校正数据集的分析显示有406个dep。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Communications
Biological Communications Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信