COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONFIGURATIONS FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC-THERMOELECTRIC GENERATOR COGENERATION SYSTEM

IF 0.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Ayop, Chee Wei Tan, Shahrin Md. Ayob, Lau Kwan Yiew, Ho Wai Shin
{"title":"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONFIGURATIONS FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC-THERMOELECTRIC GENERATOR COGENERATION SYSTEM","authors":"R. Ayop, Chee Wei Tan, Shahrin Md. Ayob, Lau Kwan Yiew, Ho Wai Shin","doi":"10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.20222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photovoltaic (PV) converts solar energy to electrical energy directly. During this process, the PV produce energy losses in the form of heat energy. To improve the system's efficiency, this heat energy is converted into electrical energy using the thermoelectric generator (TEG). The PV and TEG have a nonlinear current-voltage characteristic and it requires a power converter with maximum power point tracking (MPPT) to properly extract the energy. There are several configurations of power converters available for the PV-TEG cogeneration system (PTCS). Nonetheless, the literature that compares the performance of the configurations is unavailable. This paper compares 4 configurations for the PTCS, which include the separate boost full MPPT (SBFM), separate boost partial MPPT, series source boost MPPT, and PV boost MPPT with series TEG. The boost converter with perturb and observe MPPT method is used for all configurations to ensure a fair comparison. The results show that SBFM can efficiently extract the energy from both PV and TEG up to 98.5%. The other configurations can efficiently extract energy from the PV (more than 98.5%). However, the energy extracts from the TEG have a low efficiency down to 87%. Overall, the configuration chosen for the PTCS affects the efficiency of the system.","PeriodicalId":47541,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.20222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) converts solar energy to electrical energy directly. During this process, the PV produce energy losses in the form of heat energy. To improve the system's efficiency, this heat energy is converted into electrical energy using the thermoelectric generator (TEG). The PV and TEG have a nonlinear current-voltage characteristic and it requires a power converter with maximum power point tracking (MPPT) to properly extract the energy. There are several configurations of power converters available for the PV-TEG cogeneration system (PTCS). Nonetheless, the literature that compares the performance of the configurations is unavailable. This paper compares 4 configurations for the PTCS, which include the separate boost full MPPT (SBFM), separate boost partial MPPT, series source boost MPPT, and PV boost MPPT with series TEG. The boost converter with perturb and observe MPPT method is used for all configurations to ensure a fair comparison. The results show that SBFM can efficiently extract the energy from both PV and TEG up to 98.5%. The other configurations can efficiently extract energy from the PV (more than 98.5%). However, the energy extracts from the TEG have a low efficiency down to 87%. Overall, the configuration chosen for the PTCS affects the efficiency of the system.
光伏-热电联产系统配置的比较研究
光伏(PV)将太阳能直接转换为电能。在这个过程中,光伏以热能的形式产生能量损失。为了提高系统的效率,使用热电发电机(TEG)将这些热能转换为电能。PV和TEG具有非线性电流-电压特性,需要具有最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)的功率转换器来正确提取能量。PV-TEG热电联产系统(PTCS)有几种可用的功率转换器配置。尽管如此,对这些配置的性能进行比较的文献尚不可用。本文比较了PTCS的4种配置,包括单独升压全MPPT(SBFM)、单独升压部分MPPT、串联源升压MPPT和带串联TEG的PV升压MPPT。所有配置都使用了具有扰动和观察MPPT方法的升压转换器,以确保公平的比较。结果表明,SBFM可以有效地从PV和TEG中提取高达98.5%的能量。其他配置可以有效地提取PV中的能量(超过98.5%)。然而,从TEG中的能量提取效率低至87%。总体而言,为PTCS选择的配置会影响系统的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering
Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信