Mutual dependence and selective coercion: corporate environmental investment among Chinese private firms

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Zongshi Chen
{"title":"Mutual dependence and selective coercion: corporate environmental investment among Chinese private firms","authors":"Zongshi Chen","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2020.1768526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Neo-institutionalism suggests unified coercion which overlooks the mutual dependent relationship between state and businesses in developmental societies. This study incorporates the insight of mutual dependence, and proposes a model of selective coercion to explain how the state coerces Chinese private firms for environmental investment. Findings reveal that the local state is more likely to coerce firms that are more dependent on the state through political connections and less likely to coerce those which are highly important to local tax revenues and those which are substantially costly for regulation enforcement. Provinces that are more dependent on tourism economy exert harder coercion on firms, whereas those that place higher priority on economic development exert lighter coercion on firms. This study contributes to the literature of the neo-institutionalist theory and corporate environmental behavior.","PeriodicalId":51780,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Sociological Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"515 - 538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21620555.2020.1768526","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2020.1768526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Neo-institutionalism suggests unified coercion which overlooks the mutual dependent relationship between state and businesses in developmental societies. This study incorporates the insight of mutual dependence, and proposes a model of selective coercion to explain how the state coerces Chinese private firms for environmental investment. Findings reveal that the local state is more likely to coerce firms that are more dependent on the state through political connections and less likely to coerce those which are highly important to local tax revenues and those which are substantially costly for regulation enforcement. Provinces that are more dependent on tourism economy exert harder coercion on firms, whereas those that place higher priority on economic development exert lighter coercion on firms. This study contributes to the literature of the neo-institutionalist theory and corporate environmental behavior.
相互依赖与选择性胁迫:中国民营企业的环境投资
摘要新制度主义主张统一胁迫,忽视了发展社会中国家和企业之间的相互依赖关系。本研究结合了相互依赖的观点,提出了一个选择性胁迫模型来解释国家如何胁迫中国私营企业进行环境投资。调查结果显示,地方政府更有可能通过政治关系胁迫那些更依赖国家的公司,而不太可能胁迫那些对地方税收非常重要的公司和那些执法成本高昂的公司。更依赖旅游经济的省份对企业施加更大的胁迫,而那些更重视经济发展的省份对公司施加更轻的胁迫。本研究有助于新制度主义理论和企业环境行为的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信