Between elite reflexes and deliberative impulses: oil and the landscape of contentious politics in Ghana

IF 1.4 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
N. Oppong
{"title":"Between elite reflexes and deliberative impulses: oil and the landscape of contentious politics in Ghana","authors":"N. Oppong","doi":"10.1080/13600818.2020.1844879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT From the vested interests that have held back the promulgation of Nigeria’s petroleum industry for more than 17 years, to the sporadic stoppages that often frustrate attempts by the Kenyan government and Tullow Oil to truck oil from the Turkana region; grand schemes for petroleum resources often get entangled in a complex web of contentious politics. Nonetheless, the basic instinct of the predominant literature on oil governance has been to confine these contentious processes to the ‘black box’ of elite consolidation. Based on an in-depth account of the distinctive political economy drivers of reform in Ghana’s oil industry and the complement of Abdul Raufu Mustapha’s interpretation of the ‘multiple publics’ governing Africa’s public sphere, this article offers a pushback against this dominant narrative. It argues that the constitutive processes that drive institutional and policy reform reflect the impulses of contentious politics, instead of elite reflexes.","PeriodicalId":51612,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Development Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"329 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600818.2020.1844879","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2020.1844879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT From the vested interests that have held back the promulgation of Nigeria’s petroleum industry for more than 17 years, to the sporadic stoppages that often frustrate attempts by the Kenyan government and Tullow Oil to truck oil from the Turkana region; grand schemes for petroleum resources often get entangled in a complex web of contentious politics. Nonetheless, the basic instinct of the predominant literature on oil governance has been to confine these contentious processes to the ‘black box’ of elite consolidation. Based on an in-depth account of the distinctive political economy drivers of reform in Ghana’s oil industry and the complement of Abdul Raufu Mustapha’s interpretation of the ‘multiple publics’ governing Africa’s public sphere, this article offers a pushback against this dominant narrative. It argues that the constitutive processes that drive institutional and policy reform reflect the impulses of contentious politics, instead of elite reflexes.
精英的反应和深思熟虑的冲动之间:加纳的石油和有争议的政治景观
摘要从阻碍尼日利亚石油工业颁布17年多的既得利益者,到经常挫败肯尼亚政府和图洛石油公司从图尔卡纳地区运输石油的零星停工;石油资源的宏伟计划经常被复杂的政治争议所纠缠。尽管如此,关于石油治理的主流文献的基本本能是将这些有争议的过程限制在精英整合的“黑匣子”中。本文深入阐述了加纳石油行业改革的独特政治经济驱动因素,并补充了阿卜杜勒·劳福·穆斯塔法对治理非洲公共领域的“多重公众”的解释,对这种主导叙事进行了反驳。它认为,推动体制和政策改革的构成过程反映了有争议的政治冲动,而不是精英的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oxford Development Studies
Oxford Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Oxford Development Studies is a multidisciplinary academic journal aimed at the student, research and policy-making community, which provides a forum for rigorous and critical analysis of conventional theories and policy issues in all aspects of development, and aims to contribute to new approaches. It covers a number of disciplines related to development, including economics, history, politics, anthropology and sociology, and will publish quantitative papers as well as surveys of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信