The Omen and the Dream: Helen's and Penelope's Visions of the Eagle and the Geese in Homer, Odyssey 15.160–178 and 19.535–555

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
HELIOS Pub Date : 2019-09-28 DOI:10.1353/hel.2019.0005
Elizabeth Stockdale
{"title":"The Omen and the Dream: Helen's and Penelope's Visions of the Eagle and the Geese in Homer, Odyssey 15.160–178 and 19.535–555","authors":"Elizabeth Stockdale","doi":"10.1353/hel.2019.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the Odyssey, Helen and Penelope experience similar portents in their respective omen and dream episodes. Both involve the actions of an eagle and a goose/geese. What the interpretations of these visions also have in common is the entrenched epic's thematic focus on Odysseus's pending homecoming and the restoration of his οἶκος. Recent scholarship on Helen has commented that Od. 15.172–178 is evidence of her divine nature (Blondell 2013 and Clader 1976) and her uncanny sixth sense (Suzuki 1989). In contrast, in the dream episode, Penelope does not believe what is said to her in the dream, nor her disguised husband's exact same interpretation. Russo (1982) has argued that there is ambivalence in Penelope's complex state of mind, while Austin (1994) and Bolmarcich (2001) have focused on the intense mental harmony and ὁμοφροσύνη between Penelope and Odysseus. Amory (1966), Rozokoki (2001), and Haller (2009) discuss the dream, and Penelope and Odysseus's relationship delving into the symbolic significance of the Gates of Horn and Ivory. This paper will argue that Helen's interpretation of the omen is supportive of the Homeric οἶκος, specifically Odysseus's οἶκος. Helen's interpretation also states that Odysseus will wreak vengeance on the suitors for their breach of ξενία. While Penelope's character is the loyal, supportive, long-suffering wife, it is actually Helen, traditionally seen as the antithesis of Penelope's qualities, who interprets the shared visions of the eagle and the goose/geese in favor of Odysseus. She 'divinely' interprets Odysseus's homecoming, the cleaning of his οἶκος, and his restoration with Penelope reclaiming his rulership of Ithaca.","PeriodicalId":43032,"journal":{"name":"HELIOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/hel.2019.0005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HELIOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2019.0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:In the Odyssey, Helen and Penelope experience similar portents in their respective omen and dream episodes. Both involve the actions of an eagle and a goose/geese. What the interpretations of these visions also have in common is the entrenched epic's thematic focus on Odysseus's pending homecoming and the restoration of his οἶκος. Recent scholarship on Helen has commented that Od. 15.172–178 is evidence of her divine nature (Blondell 2013 and Clader 1976) and her uncanny sixth sense (Suzuki 1989). In contrast, in the dream episode, Penelope does not believe what is said to her in the dream, nor her disguised husband's exact same interpretation. Russo (1982) has argued that there is ambivalence in Penelope's complex state of mind, while Austin (1994) and Bolmarcich (2001) have focused on the intense mental harmony and ὁμοφροσύνη between Penelope and Odysseus. Amory (1966), Rozokoki (2001), and Haller (2009) discuss the dream, and Penelope and Odysseus's relationship delving into the symbolic significance of the Gates of Horn and Ivory. This paper will argue that Helen's interpretation of the omen is supportive of the Homeric οἶκος, specifically Odysseus's οἶκος. Helen's interpretation also states that Odysseus will wreak vengeance on the suitors for their breach of ξενία. While Penelope's character is the loyal, supportive, long-suffering wife, it is actually Helen, traditionally seen as the antithesis of Penelope's qualities, who interprets the shared visions of the eagle and the goose/geese in favor of Odysseus. She 'divinely' interprets Odysseus's homecoming, the cleaning of his οἶκος, and his restoration with Penelope reclaiming his rulership of Ithaca.
预兆与梦:海伦和佩内洛普对荷马,奥德赛15.160-178和19.535-555中的鹰和鹅的幻想
摘要:在《奥德赛》中,海伦和佩内洛普在各自的预兆和梦境中都经历了类似的预兆。两者都涉及鹰和鹅的动作。对这些愿景的解释还有一个共同点,那就是这部根深蒂固的史诗对奥德修斯即将回家的主题关注,以及对他的“ἶκς。最近关于海伦的学术评论说。15.172–178证明了她的神性(Blondell 2013和Clader 1976)和她不可思议的第六感(Suzuki 1989)。相比之下,在梦中,佩内洛普不相信梦中对她说的话,也不相信她伪装的丈夫完全相同的解释。Russo(1982)认为佩内洛普复杂的心理状态中存在矛盾心理,而Austin(1994)和Bolmarich(2001)则关注强烈的心理和谐和ὁμ?φρ?σύ在佩内洛普和奥德修斯之间。阿莫里(1966)、罗佐科基(2001)和哈勒(2009)讨论了这个梦,佩内洛普和奥德修斯的关系深入探讨了霍恩和象牙之门的象征意义。本文认为海伦对预兆的解释是支持荷马的ἶκς,特别是奥德修斯的ἶκς。海伦的解释还指出,奥德修斯将对追求者破坏ξε的行为进行报复ία。虽然佩内洛普笔下的角色是忠诚、支持、长期受苦的妻子,但实际上是海伦,传统上被视为佩内洛普的品质的对立面,她将鹰和鹅的共同愿景解读为有利于奥德修斯。她“神圣地”诠释了奥德修斯的回家之旅,清洗了他的ἶκς,以及他与佩内洛普恢复伊萨卡统治的复辟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HELIOS
HELIOS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信