Causes of revision after total hip arthroplasty in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty younger than 50 years of age

Hemant H. Mathur, Kashyap L Zala, Jimmy Chokshi
{"title":"Causes of revision after total hip arthroplasty in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty younger than 50 years of age","authors":"Hemant H. Mathur, Kashyap L Zala, Jimmy Chokshi","doi":"10.4103/jodp.jodp_100_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Young patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have different indications and causes of failure of THA. This retrospective cohort study examines the causes of failure of THA in a patient younger than 50 years. Subjects and Methods: Clinical and demographic data of 146 revision THA (130 patients) were gathered from case records of patients who underwent revision THA at our institute between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Fifty-two hips (46 patients) were younger than 50 years at the time of revision. Baseline characteristics, cause for revision, implants revised, and duration of survival were noted. Statistical Analysis: Chi-squared test was implemented to find a correlation, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We had 52 hips, 46 patients (28 females), and the mean age at primary THA was 33.9 years, the mean age at revision THA was 44.5 years, and the mean survival of implants was 10.6 years. The most common diagnosis for primary THA was avascular necrosis of the femoral head (21 hips, 40.38%), followed by inflammatory arthritis. The most common cause of failure was aseptic loosening (27 hips, 51.92%). As compared to the overall population undergoing revision THA (60/146 hips, 41.09%), patients younger than 50 years having more frequency of aseptic loosening as a cause of failure of THA and less frequency of periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and fracture; but statistically significant difference was not found (P = 0.38). No correlation was found between the type of implants used (P = 0.84) and diagnosis at index THA (P = 0.78), with the cause of failure of THA. Conclusions: Aseptic loosening of THA is the most common mode of failure in patients younger than 50 years.","PeriodicalId":34809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","volume":"6 1","pages":"111 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_100_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Young patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have different indications and causes of failure of THA. This retrospective cohort study examines the causes of failure of THA in a patient younger than 50 years. Subjects and Methods: Clinical and demographic data of 146 revision THA (130 patients) were gathered from case records of patients who underwent revision THA at our institute between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Fifty-two hips (46 patients) were younger than 50 years at the time of revision. Baseline characteristics, cause for revision, implants revised, and duration of survival were noted. Statistical Analysis: Chi-squared test was implemented to find a correlation, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We had 52 hips, 46 patients (28 females), and the mean age at primary THA was 33.9 years, the mean age at revision THA was 44.5 years, and the mean survival of implants was 10.6 years. The most common diagnosis for primary THA was avascular necrosis of the femoral head (21 hips, 40.38%), followed by inflammatory arthritis. The most common cause of failure was aseptic loosening (27 hips, 51.92%). As compared to the overall population undergoing revision THA (60/146 hips, 41.09%), patients younger than 50 years having more frequency of aseptic loosening as a cause of failure of THA and less frequency of periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and fracture; but statistically significant difference was not found (P = 0.38). No correlation was found between the type of implants used (P = 0.84) and diagnosis at index THA (P = 0.78), with the cause of failure of THA. Conclusions: Aseptic loosening of THA is the most common mode of failure in patients younger than 50 years.
年龄小于50岁的患者行全髋关节置换术后翻修的原因
背景与目的:接受全髋关节置换术(THA)翻修的年轻患者有不同的适应症和失败原因。这项回顾性队列研究调查了一名50岁以下患者THA失败的原因。受试者和方法:从2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在我们研究所接受翻修THA的患者的病例记录中收集146例翻修THA(130名患者)的临床和人口统计学数据。52个髋关节(46名患者)在翻修时年龄小于50岁。记录基线特征、翻修原因、翻修植入物和生存期。统计学分析:采用卡方检验,发现相关性,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:我们有52个髋关节,46名患者(28名女性),原发性THA的平均年龄为33.9岁,翻修性THA平均年龄为44.5岁,植入物的平均生存期为10.6年。原发性THA最常见的诊断是股骨头缺血性坏死(21髋,40.38%),其次是炎性关节炎。最常见的失败原因是无菌性松动(27髋,51.92%)。与接受翻修THA的总人群(60/146髋,41.09%)相比,50岁以下的患者作为THA失败原因的无菌性松动频率更高,假体周围关节感染、不稳定和骨折的频率更低;但差异无统计学意义(P=0.38)。所用植入物类型(P=0.84)和THA指数诊断(P=0.78)与THA失败原因无相关性。结论:THA无菌性松动术是50岁以下患者最常见的失败方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信