Defusing Brazil’s Woman Militant

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dana A. Meredith
{"title":"Defusing Brazil’s Woman Militant","authors":"Dana A. Meredith","doi":"10.3368/lbr.56.2.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines two films that portray the experiences of women in armed revolutionary movements in twentieth-century Brazil: Olga (2004), directed by Jayme Monjardim and set in the 1930s during the dictatorship of Getúlio Vargas, and O que é isso, companheiro? (1997), directed by Bruno Barreto and centered on the 1969 kidnapping of Charles Burke Elbrick, the American ambassador to Brazil. An examination of the potential of historical fiction and fictionalized history to expand the historical record and contest the “official” accounts of past-marginalized groups reveals a similar discrepancy in both films: While they establish counternarratives for leftist groups, they reproduce and reinforce heteronormative, binary divisions of gender. Drawing upon Jack Halberstam’s notion of female masculinity, this article argues that the two films seek to “correct” the gender expression of their lead female characters, sliding them from positions of masculine power to ones of feminine weakness and self-sacrifice. Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of the “double bind” and recent Brazilian politics reveal how the films, inadvertently, capture the dilemma of women seeking to wield authority in Brazil: While a woman’s feminine presentation is not respected as strong by the Brazilian public, her masculine expression is not seen as legitimate.","PeriodicalId":52041,"journal":{"name":"Luso-Brazilian Review","volume":"56 1","pages":"104 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Luso-Brazilian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.56.2.84","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines two films that portray the experiences of women in armed revolutionary movements in twentieth-century Brazil: Olga (2004), directed by Jayme Monjardim and set in the 1930s during the dictatorship of Getúlio Vargas, and O que é isso, companheiro? (1997), directed by Bruno Barreto and centered on the 1969 kidnapping of Charles Burke Elbrick, the American ambassador to Brazil. An examination of the potential of historical fiction and fictionalized history to expand the historical record and contest the “official” accounts of past-marginalized groups reveals a similar discrepancy in both films: While they establish counternarratives for leftist groups, they reproduce and reinforce heteronormative, binary divisions of gender. Drawing upon Jack Halberstam’s notion of female masculinity, this article argues that the two films seek to “correct” the gender expression of their lead female characters, sliding them from positions of masculine power to ones of feminine weakness and self-sacrifice. Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of the “double bind” and recent Brazilian politics reveal how the films, inadvertently, capture the dilemma of women seeking to wield authority in Brazil: While a woman’s feminine presentation is not respected as strong by the Brazilian public, her masculine expression is not seen as legitimate.
化解巴西女性武装分子
本文考察了两部描绘二十世纪巴西武装革命运动中女性经历的电影:《奥尔加》(2004),由杰米·蒙贾尔丁执导,背景设定在1930年代Getúlio巴尔加斯独裁统治时期;(1997),布鲁诺·巴雷托执导,故事围绕1969年美国驻巴西大使查尔斯·伯克·埃尔布里克绑架案展开。对历史小说和虚构历史在扩大历史记录和质疑过去被边缘化群体的“官方”描述方面的潜力的考察,揭示了两部电影中类似的差异:它们在为左翼群体建立反叙事的同时,复制并强化了异性恋规范的、二元的性别划分。借鉴Jack Halberstam关于女性男性气质的观点,本文认为这两部电影试图“纠正”女主角的性别表达,将她们从男性力量的位置滑到女性软弱和自我牺牲的位置。皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)关于“双重束缚”的概念,以及最近的巴西政治,揭示了这些电影是如何不经意地捕捉到女性在巴西寻求行使权威的困境:尽管女性的女性化表现不受巴西公众的强烈尊重,但她的男性化表达却不被视为合法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Luso-Brazilian Review
Luso-Brazilian Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Luso-Brazilian Review publishes interdisciplinary scholarship on Portuguese, Brazilian, and Lusophone African cultures, with special emphasis on scholarly works in literature, history, and the social sciences. Each issue of the Luso-Brazilian Review includes articles and book reviews, which may be written in either English or Portuguese.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信