USE OF ENHANCED FEEDBACK IN AN ELECTRONIC LEARNING COURSE “FUNDAMENTALS OF MOLECULAR PHYSICS AND THERMODYNAMICS”

IF 0.2 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yelena Yurievna Orekhova, S. M. Sysoev, Maxim Mikhailovich Alekseev
{"title":"USE OF ENHANCED FEEDBACK IN AN ELECTRONIC LEARNING COURSE “FUNDAMENTALS OF MOLECULAR PHYSICS AND THERMODYNAMICS”","authors":"Yelena Yurievna Orekhova, S. M. Sysoev, Maxim Mikhailovich Alekseev","doi":"10.52571/ptq.v18.n39.2021.06_orekhova_pgs_71_87.pdf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Being an essential part of the educational process, blended learning still faces some problems concerning the interaction between teachers and students. They include a decrease in the level of knowledge and in the number of graduates as students experience a lack of live communication with the teacher, lack of sufficient experience of independent work, lack of interactive assessment. Aim: This study aimed to elaborate the model of enhanced feedback in an e-learning course, “Fundamentals of Molecular Physics and Thermodynamics,” to increase student educational achievements. Methods: The effectiveness of the model of enhanced feedback in the learning process was measured with the methodology for calculating statistical indicators of the quality of education: knowledge quality, level of student proficiency, progress, and average grade. To measure the emotional and evaluative attitude of students to educational activities and interaction with the teacher in an electronic course, a test-questionnaire satisfaction with learning activity was employed. Results and Discussion: the results of the initial and final control of the statistical indicators of the quality of education including knowledge quality, level of student proficiency, progress, and average grade in students showed a significant difference between the control and the experimental groups. At the end of the semester, the difference in knowledge quality was 23%, student proficiency level – 13%, progress – 3.5%, average grade – 0.6 scores. The analysis of student satisfaction with the learning process also confirms an increase in satisfaction with the learning process and with the interaction with the lecturer. Thus, the experimental methodology contributes to a significant improvement in the learning process results. Conclusions: The experiment demonstrated that replacing formative assessment with the model of enhanced feedback raises student educational achievements and compensates for lack of live communication with the teacher.","PeriodicalId":45103,"journal":{"name":"Periodico Tche Quimica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodico Tche Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52571/ptq.v18.n39.2021.06_orekhova_pgs_71_87.pdf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Being an essential part of the educational process, blended learning still faces some problems concerning the interaction between teachers and students. They include a decrease in the level of knowledge and in the number of graduates as students experience a lack of live communication with the teacher, lack of sufficient experience of independent work, lack of interactive assessment. Aim: This study aimed to elaborate the model of enhanced feedback in an e-learning course, “Fundamentals of Molecular Physics and Thermodynamics,” to increase student educational achievements. Methods: The effectiveness of the model of enhanced feedback in the learning process was measured with the methodology for calculating statistical indicators of the quality of education: knowledge quality, level of student proficiency, progress, and average grade. To measure the emotional and evaluative attitude of students to educational activities and interaction with the teacher in an electronic course, a test-questionnaire satisfaction with learning activity was employed. Results and Discussion: the results of the initial and final control of the statistical indicators of the quality of education including knowledge quality, level of student proficiency, progress, and average grade in students showed a significant difference between the control and the experimental groups. At the end of the semester, the difference in knowledge quality was 23%, student proficiency level – 13%, progress – 3.5%, average grade – 0.6 scores. The analysis of student satisfaction with the learning process also confirms an increase in satisfaction with the learning process and with the interaction with the lecturer. Thus, the experimental methodology contributes to a significant improvement in the learning process results. Conclusions: The experiment demonstrated that replacing formative assessment with the model of enhanced feedback raises student educational achievements and compensates for lack of live communication with the teacher.
在电子学习课程“分子物理与热力学基础”中使用增强反馈
背景:混合式学习作为教育过程的重要组成部分,在师生互动方面还面临着一些问题。其中包括学生的知识水平和毕业生数量的下降,因为学生缺乏与老师的实时交流,缺乏足够的独立工作经验,缺乏互动评估。摘要目的:探讨“分子物理与热力学基础”网络教学中强化反馈的模式,以提高学生的学习成绩。方法:采用计算教育质量统计指标的方法:知识质量、学生熟练程度、进步程度和平均成绩,来衡量强化反馈模型在学习过程中的有效性。为了测量学生在电子课程中对教育活动和与教师互动的情感态度和评价态度,采用了学习活动满意度测试问卷。结果与讨论:在知识质量、学生熟练程度、进步程度、学生平均成绩等教育质量统计指标的初控和终控结果中,对照组与实验组之间存在显著差异。学期结束时,知识质量的差异为23%,学生熟练程度为13%,进步为3.5%,平均成绩为0.6分。学生对学习过程满意度的分析也证实了学生对学习过程和与讲师互动的满意度有所提高。因此,实验方法有助于显著改善学习过程的结果。结论:实验表明,用增强反馈模式取代形成性评估提高了学生的学习成绩,弥补了与老师缺乏实时交流的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Periodico Tche Quimica
Periodico Tche Quimica CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, short communications (scientific publications), book reviews, forum articles, announcements or letters as well as interviews. Researchers from all countries are invited to publish on its pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信