COMPARISON OF THE SHEAR STRENGTH IN HEAVY AND SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE

Q1 Engineering
G. Nesvetaev, Yuliya Koryanova, A. Chepurnenko
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE SHEAR STRENGTH IN HEAVY AND SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE","authors":"G. Nesvetaev, Yuliya Koryanova, A. Chepurnenko","doi":"10.23968/2500-0055-2023-8-2-63-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The shear strength of concrete, while not being an independently standardized indicator of concrete quality, plays an important role in the analysis of reinforced concrete structures. The concepts related to the dependence of the shear strength of concrete on the standardized compressive and axial tensile strength are quite ambiguous. Self-compacting concrete (SCC), which has been widely used recently, is somewhat different from ordinary concrete (OC) compacted by vibration in terms of structure and properties, and data on the shear strength of SCC are sparse. Purpose of the study: We aimed to clarify the dependence of the shear strength of concrete on the standardized compressive and axial tensile strength, and assess the shear strength of SCC in comparison with that of OC. Methods: We compared the shear strength of SCC with that of OC experimentally, by applying the common methodology with the use of a Mörsch specimen and performing modeling in MATLAB with the use of six strength theories. Results: No significant differences were found in the dependence of the shear strength of SCC in comparison with that of OC at the design age of 28 days. In terms of quantity, the excess of the shear strength of SCC relative to OC is less than 12%. The best agreement with the experimental data among those analyzed is provided by the Geniev theory. The shear strength of concretes is most likely described by the equation Rsh=k*(R*Rt)^(1/2) at k = 0.5–0.6.","PeriodicalId":52295,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2023-8-2-63-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The shear strength of concrete, while not being an independently standardized indicator of concrete quality, plays an important role in the analysis of reinforced concrete structures. The concepts related to the dependence of the shear strength of concrete on the standardized compressive and axial tensile strength are quite ambiguous. Self-compacting concrete (SCC), which has been widely used recently, is somewhat different from ordinary concrete (OC) compacted by vibration in terms of structure and properties, and data on the shear strength of SCC are sparse. Purpose of the study: We aimed to clarify the dependence of the shear strength of concrete on the standardized compressive and axial tensile strength, and assess the shear strength of SCC in comparison with that of OC. Methods: We compared the shear strength of SCC with that of OC experimentally, by applying the common methodology with the use of a Mörsch specimen and performing modeling in MATLAB with the use of six strength theories. Results: No significant differences were found in the dependence of the shear strength of SCC in comparison with that of OC at the design age of 28 days. In terms of quantity, the excess of the shear strength of SCC relative to OC is less than 12%. The best agreement with the experimental data among those analyzed is provided by the Geniev theory. The shear strength of concretes is most likely described by the equation Rsh=k*(R*Rt)^(1/2) at k = 0.5–0.6.
重质混凝土与自密实混凝土抗剪强度比较
介绍混凝土抗剪强度虽然不是一个独立标准化的混凝土质量指标,但在钢筋混凝土结构的分析中起着重要作用。与混凝土抗剪强度与标准抗压强度和轴向抗拉强度的相关性有关的概念相当模糊。自密实混凝土(SCC)近年来得到了广泛的应用,其结构和性能与振动压实的普通混凝土(OC)有所不同,有关SCC抗剪强度的数据也很少。研究目的:我们旨在阐明混凝土抗剪强度对标准抗压强度和轴向抗拉强度的依赖性,并评估SCC与OC的抗剪强度的比较。方法:我们通过实验比较了SCC和OC的抗剪强度,方法是使用Mörsch样本应用常用方法,并使用六种强度理论在MATLAB中进行建模。结果:与设计龄期为28天的OC相比,SCC的抗剪强度依赖性没有显著差异。就数量而言,SCC的抗剪强度相对于OC的过量小于12%。Geniev理论提供了与实验数据的最佳一致性。混凝土的抗剪强度很可能由公式Rsh=k*(R*Rt)^(1/2)描述,k=0.5–0.6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Architecture and Engineering
Architecture and Engineering Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信