Unobvious Parallels: Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje, Wacław Sieroszewski, and Their Role in Gathering Imperial Knowledge in Sumatra and Yakutia in the 1890S

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
D. Kołodziejczyk, I. Chabrowski
{"title":"Unobvious Parallels: Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje, Wacław Sieroszewski, and Their Role in Gathering Imperial Knowledge in Sumatra and Yakutia in the 1890S","authors":"D. Kołodziejczyk, I. Chabrowski","doi":"10.1353/jwh.2023.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The article focuses on two authors who in the 1890s contributed towards the European knowledge of two Asiatic societies—the Acehnese in Sumatra and the Yakuts in Syberia. They arrived in Asia in very different capacities: a Dutchman Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje as an advisor to the Dutch colonial government, and a Pole Wacław Sieroszewski as a political prisoner. Whereas Snouck Hurgronje was an established scholar, Sieroszewski was a self-taught ethnographer, who traded his knowledge gathered during the years of exile for freedom and scholarly recognition, granted by institutions of the same Russian empire against which he had fought as a Polish revolutionary. And yet there were also striking similarities between the two men. They both owed their intimacy with the studied societies to their \"going native,\" including marriages with local women. Their works also reveal common patterns as they followed scholarly standards accepted in post-Enlightenment Europe, although Sieroszewski was less persuaded of the merits of Europe's \"civilizing mission.\" The two cases shed light on two European imperialisms that deviated from the \"ideal type,\" associated by Edward Said with Britain and France, as well as different circumstances of the encounters between Europeans and Asians along with their ethical implications.","PeriodicalId":17466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World History","volume":"34 1","pages":"47 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2023.0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The article focuses on two authors who in the 1890s contributed towards the European knowledge of two Asiatic societies—the Acehnese in Sumatra and the Yakuts in Syberia. They arrived in Asia in very different capacities: a Dutchman Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje as an advisor to the Dutch colonial government, and a Pole Wacław Sieroszewski as a political prisoner. Whereas Snouck Hurgronje was an established scholar, Sieroszewski was a self-taught ethnographer, who traded his knowledge gathered during the years of exile for freedom and scholarly recognition, granted by institutions of the same Russian empire against which he had fought as a Polish revolutionary. And yet there were also striking similarities between the two men. They both owed their intimacy with the studied societies to their "going native," including marriages with local women. Their works also reveal common patterns as they followed scholarly standards accepted in post-Enlightenment Europe, although Sieroszewski was less persuaded of the merits of Europe's "civilizing mission." The two cases shed light on two European imperialisms that deviated from the "ideal type," associated by Edward Said with Britain and France, as well as different circumstances of the encounters between Europeans and Asians along with their ethical implications.
显而易见的相似之处:Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje、Wacław Sieroszewski及其在19世纪90年代苏门答腊和雅库特收集帝国知识中的作用
摘要:这篇文章的重点是两位作者,他们在19世纪90年代为欧洲了解两个亚洲社会做出了贡献——苏门答腊的亚齐人和西贝里的雅库特人。他们以截然不同的身份抵达亚洲:一名荷兰人克里斯蒂安·斯努克·赫尔格隆杰(Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje)是荷兰殖民政府的顾问,另一名波兰人瓦科瓦夫·西罗泽夫斯基(Pole Wacław Sieroszewski)是政治犯。Snouck Hurgronje是一位知名学者,而Sieroszewski是一位自学成才的民族志学家,他用流亡期间收集的知识换取自由和学术认可,这些自由和认可是他作为波兰革命者与之斗争的同一俄罗斯帝国的机构所给予的。然而,两人之间也有惊人的相似之处。他们都将与被研究社会的亲密关系归功于他们的“本土化”,包括与当地女性的婚姻。他们的作品也揭示了他们遵循启蒙运动后欧洲公认的学术标准的共同模式,尽管Sieroszewski不太相信欧洲“文明使命”的优点。这两个案例揭示了爱德华·赛义德与英国和法国联系在一起的两种偏离“理想类型”的欧洲帝国主义,以及欧洲人和亚洲人遭遇的不同情况及其伦理含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Devoted to historical analysis from a global point of view, the Journal of World History features a range of comparative and cross-cultural scholarship and encourages research on forces that work their influences across cultures and civilizations. Themes examined include large-scale population movements and economic fluctuations; cross-cultural transfers of technology; the spread of infectious diseases; long-distance trade; and the spread of religious faiths, ideas, and ideals. Individual subscription is by membership in the World History Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信