Physiological and morphological responses of two beans common genotype to water stress at different phenological stages

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Fogaça, A. D. Castro, E. A. Barbosa
{"title":"Physiological and morphological responses of two beans common genotype to water stress at different phenological stages","authors":"A. Fogaça, A. D. Castro, E. A. Barbosa","doi":"10.14393/bj-v39n0a2023-59855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comprehension of the bean responses of beans common under to water deficit is an important tool in agricultural planning, like sowing time, and deficit irrigation management strategies. The study aimed to understand the morpho-physiological responses and yield attributes of two common bean genotypes submitted to water stress at different phenological stages. The study was carried out in a greenhouse, in randomized block scheme with five repetitions. To achieve the objectives deficit irrigation of 25% of crop evapotranspiration was practiced during vegetative (DI-V), flowering (DI-F), and pod filling (DI-PF) stages. A non-deficit irrigated (NDI) and deficit irrigated through vegetative to pod filling stages (DI-VP) treatments were added for comparison. The following morphophysiological responses and yield attributes were evaluated: net assimilation of CO2, stomatal conductance, and leaf transpiration, chlorophyll index, number of trifoliate leaves, chlorophyll index, leaf area, number of grains per plant, number of grains per pod, number of pods per plant, the mass of thousand grains, harvest index, and water use efficiency. The beans genotype under DI-V exhibited acclimation, observed by the relative increment with NDI of 195%, 759%, and 231% of net assimilation of CO2, stomatal conductance, and leaf transpiration, respectively. Plants under treatment DI-PF experienced dis-stress and plastic responses as leaf losses and exhaustion of gas exchanges. Treatment DI-V received 11% less water than NDI and exhibited equal yield, resulting in higher water use efficiency. Yield attributes correlations indicated that yield penalty might be related to pods abortion, which not occurred to plants under DI-V.","PeriodicalId":8951,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14393/bj-v39n0a2023-59855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehension of the bean responses of beans common under to water deficit is an important tool in agricultural planning, like sowing time, and deficit irrigation management strategies. The study aimed to understand the morpho-physiological responses and yield attributes of two common bean genotypes submitted to water stress at different phenological stages. The study was carried out in a greenhouse, in randomized block scheme with five repetitions. To achieve the objectives deficit irrigation of 25% of crop evapotranspiration was practiced during vegetative (DI-V), flowering (DI-F), and pod filling (DI-PF) stages. A non-deficit irrigated (NDI) and deficit irrigated through vegetative to pod filling stages (DI-VP) treatments were added for comparison. The following morphophysiological responses and yield attributes were evaluated: net assimilation of CO2, stomatal conductance, and leaf transpiration, chlorophyll index, number of trifoliate leaves, chlorophyll index, leaf area, number of grains per plant, number of grains per pod, number of pods per plant, the mass of thousand grains, harvest index, and water use efficiency. The beans genotype under DI-V exhibited acclimation, observed by the relative increment with NDI of 195%, 759%, and 231% of net assimilation of CO2, stomatal conductance, and leaf transpiration, respectively. Plants under treatment DI-PF experienced dis-stress and plastic responses as leaf losses and exhaustion of gas exchanges. Treatment DI-V received 11% less water than NDI and exhibited equal yield, resulting in higher water use efficiency. Yield attributes correlations indicated that yield penalty might be related to pods abortion, which not occurred to plants under DI-V.
两种普通基因型大豆不同物候期对水分胁迫的生理形态响应
了解常见缺水豆类对缺水的反应是农业规划的重要工具,如播种时间和缺水灌溉管理策略。本研究旨在了解两种常见大豆基因型在不同酚期对水分胁迫的形态生理反应和产量特性。这项研究是在温室中进行的,采用随机分组方案,重复五次。为了实现这一目标,在营养期(DI-V)、开花期(DI-F)和盛荚期(DI-PF)进行了25%作物蒸发蒸腾量的亏缺灌溉。添加了非亏缺灌溉(NDI)和通过营养-豆荚灌浆阶段(DI-VP)亏缺灌溉处理进行比较。评估了以下形态生理响应和产量属性:CO2净同化、气孔导度和叶片蒸腾、叶绿素指数、三叶叶数、叶绿素指数,叶面积、单株粒数、每荚粒数、单株荚数、千粒质量、收获指数和水分利用效率。DI-V下的大豆基因型表现出驯化,NDI对CO2净同化、气孔导度和叶片蒸腾的相对增量分别为195%、759%和231%。处理DI-PF的植物经历了脱胁迫和塑性反应,如叶片损失和气体交换耗尽。处理DI-V比NDI少接收11%的水,并且表现出相同的产率,导致更高的水利用效率。产量-属性相关性表明,产量惩罚可能与荚败育有关,而DI-V下的植株没有发生这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioscience Journal
Bioscience Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bioscience Journal is an interdisciplinary electronic journal that publishes scientific articles in the areas of Agricultural Sciences, Biological Sciences and Health Sciences. Its mission is to disseminate new knowledge while contributing to the development of science in the country and in the world. The journal is published in a continuous flow, in English. The opinions and concepts expressed in the published articles are the sole responsibility of their authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信