Arthroscopic fixation with figure of 8 suture versus ladder mesh suture for anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture

Q4 Medicine
Shi-jun Gao
{"title":"Arthroscopic fixation with figure of 8 suture versus ladder mesh suture for anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture","authors":"Shi-jun Gao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the primary clinical results of arthroscopic figure of 8 suture and ladder mesh suture fixations in treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial avulsion fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom August 2013 to November 2016, a total of 37 patients with ACL tibial avulsion fracture who had closed epiphyses underwent arthroscopy. By the Meyers-McKeever-Zaricznyj classification, 10 cases were type II, 22 type III and 5 type IV. There were 25 cases in the figure of 8 suture fixation group with two No.2 high-strength sutures crossed to form a 8 figure to pull out and fix the fracture through the tibial tunnels, including 17 males and 8 females with an average age of 18.91±9.34 years (range 14-36 years). The ladder mesh suture fixation group with three No.2 high-strength sutures woven into a mesh to pull out and fix the fracture through the tibial tunnels had 12 cases, including 8 males and 4 females with an average age of 19.63±7.85 years (range 15-33 years). At the latest follow-up, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were used to estimate knee joint function, while the Lachman test and Pivot-shift test were used to estimate knee joint instability. The operation duration, knee range of motion (ROM) and the number of case with flexion contracture were evaluated. \n \n \nResults \nAll 37 cases were followed up. The average follow-up duration was 16.35±5.27 months (range 10-22 months) in figure of 8 suture fixation group and 14.06±7.18 months (range 10-21 months) in ladder mesh suture fixation group. In figure of 8 suture fixation group, the Lysholm and IKDC average scores were 95.86±5.74 and 90.53±4.61, respectively. However, they were 96.53±3.17 and 92.15±5.54 in ladder mesh suture fixation group with no significant difference between the two groups after operation (t=0.723, P=0.462; t=1.018, P=0.279). The percentage of negative Lachman test and Pivot-shift test in the figure of 8 suture group was 92% (23/25) . There was no significant difference in the negative rate in the ladder mesh suture fixation group 100% (12/12, χ2=0.904, P=0.265). The average operation duration of ladder mesh suture fixation group was 61.8±6.3 minutes, which was longer than that of figure of 8 suture fixation group 43.5±5.9 minutes (t=2.714, P=0.025). Flexion contracture of ≥5° occurred in 4 cases in the figure of 8 suture group and 0 case in the ladder mesh suture fixation group with significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.450, P=0.032). \n \n \nConclusion \nIn treating ACL tibial avulsion fractures, arthroscopic figure of 8 suture fixation and ladder mesh suture fixation can achieve satisfied functional recovery and stability. The ladder mesh suture fixation can effectively achieve reduction of fracture fragments and knee flexion contracture. It may have more advantages in treating rotational type III and type IV comminuted fractures. However, some disadvantages in this technique, such as high technical requirements and long operation time, have to be considered. \n \n \nKey words: \nArthroscopy; Sutures; Fracture fixation, internal; Anterior cruciate ligament","PeriodicalId":36405,"journal":{"name":"中华骨科杂志","volume":"40 1","pages":"146-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the primary clinical results of arthroscopic figure of 8 suture and ladder mesh suture fixations in treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial avulsion fractures. Methods From August 2013 to November 2016, a total of 37 patients with ACL tibial avulsion fracture who had closed epiphyses underwent arthroscopy. By the Meyers-McKeever-Zaricznyj classification, 10 cases were type II, 22 type III and 5 type IV. There were 25 cases in the figure of 8 suture fixation group with two No.2 high-strength sutures crossed to form a 8 figure to pull out and fix the fracture through the tibial tunnels, including 17 males and 8 females with an average age of 18.91±9.34 years (range 14-36 years). The ladder mesh suture fixation group with three No.2 high-strength sutures woven into a mesh to pull out and fix the fracture through the tibial tunnels had 12 cases, including 8 males and 4 females with an average age of 19.63±7.85 years (range 15-33 years). At the latest follow-up, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were used to estimate knee joint function, while the Lachman test and Pivot-shift test were used to estimate knee joint instability. The operation duration, knee range of motion (ROM) and the number of case with flexion contracture were evaluated. Results All 37 cases were followed up. The average follow-up duration was 16.35±5.27 months (range 10-22 months) in figure of 8 suture fixation group and 14.06±7.18 months (range 10-21 months) in ladder mesh suture fixation group. In figure of 8 suture fixation group, the Lysholm and IKDC average scores were 95.86±5.74 and 90.53±4.61, respectively. However, they were 96.53±3.17 and 92.15±5.54 in ladder mesh suture fixation group with no significant difference between the two groups after operation (t=0.723, P=0.462; t=1.018, P=0.279). The percentage of negative Lachman test and Pivot-shift test in the figure of 8 suture group was 92% (23/25) . There was no significant difference in the negative rate in the ladder mesh suture fixation group 100% (12/12, χ2=0.904, P=0.265). The average operation duration of ladder mesh suture fixation group was 61.8±6.3 minutes, which was longer than that of figure of 8 suture fixation group 43.5±5.9 minutes (t=2.714, P=0.025). Flexion contracture of ≥5° occurred in 4 cases in the figure of 8 suture group and 0 case in the ladder mesh suture fixation group with significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.450, P=0.032). Conclusion In treating ACL tibial avulsion fractures, arthroscopic figure of 8 suture fixation and ladder mesh suture fixation can achieve satisfied functional recovery and stability. The ladder mesh suture fixation can effectively achieve reduction of fracture fragments and knee flexion contracture. It may have more advantages in treating rotational type III and type IV comminuted fractures. However, some disadvantages in this technique, such as high technical requirements and long operation time, have to be considered. Key words: Arthroscopy; Sutures; Fracture fixation, internal; Anterior cruciate ligament
关节镜下8字形缝合与梯网缝合治疗胫骨前交叉韧带撕脱骨折
目的比较关节镜下8缝线与梯网缝线固定治疗前交叉韧带胫骨撕脱骨折的初步临床效果。方法2013年8月至2016年11月,对37例闭合性骨骺前交叉韧带胫骨撕脱骨折患者进行关节镜检查。根据Meyers-McKeever-Zaricznyj分类,II型10例,III型22例,IV型5例。8缝线固定组25例,两根2号高强度缝线交叉形成8字形,通过胫骨隧道拔出并固定骨折,其中男性17例,女性8例,平均年龄18.91±9.34岁(14-36岁)。梯网缝线固定组12例,其中男性8例,女性4例,平均年龄19.63±7.85岁(15-33岁)。在最新的随访中,Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)的评分被用于评估膝关节功能,而Lachman测试和Pivot移位测试被用于估计膝关节不稳定性。评估手术时间、膝关节活动范围(ROM)和屈曲挛缩病例数。结果37例均获得随访。8缝线固定组的平均随访时间为16.35±5.27个月(10-22个月),梯网缝线固定组为14.06±7.18个月(10-201个月)。在8缝线固定组中,Lysholm和IKDC的平均得分分别为95.86±5.74和90.53±4.61。梯网缝线固定组分别为96.53±3.17和92.15±5.54,两组术后差异无统计学意义(t=0.723,P=0.462;t=1.018,P=0.279),Lachman试验和Pivot shift试验阴性率在8缝线组中为92%(23/25)。梯网缝线固定组阴性率100%无显著性差异(12/12,χ2=0.904,P=0.265),比8缝线组延长43.5±5.9分钟(t=2.714,P=0.025)。8缝线组4例和梯网缝线固定组0例发生≥5°屈曲挛缩,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=0.450,P=0.032),关节镜下8缝线固定和梯网缝线固定可以达到满意的功能恢复和稳定性。梯网缝合内固定可有效减少骨折碎片和膝关节屈曲挛缩。它在治疗III型和IV型旋转性粉碎性骨折方面可能更有优势。然而,必须考虑该技术的一些缺点,如技术要求高和操作时间长。关键词:关节镜检查;缝线;骨折内固定术;前交叉韧带
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华骨科杂志
中华骨科杂志 Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8153
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信