Quality of Maternal & Newborns Health indicators in Western Province of Rwanda

E. Rutayisire, Mathieu Niyonkuru
{"title":"Quality of Maternal & Newborns Health indicators in Western Province of Rwanda","authors":"E. Rutayisire, Mathieu Niyonkuru","doi":"10.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-22-4313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data quality is defined as a measure of data status that fulfills the following elements: accuracy, completeness, consistency, reliability, and if the data is current. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that only 40% of all countries have an adequate system to collect information on birth and deaths. Even though the system is there, vital registration systems are inaccurate and incomplete in developing countries. In Rwanda, maternal health related data was over-reported more than other indicators. These are the main reasons for conducting the study to investigate the data quality of four maternal and newborn health indicators reported by Rwandan Western Province health centers. This concurrent-mixed method study included 61 data managers and 12 key informants. Routine data quality assessment tool and structured interview guide were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used to get proportion of respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics. The analysis was done for assessing median of data quality index. The results show that 55.7% of data managers were male while 58.3% of responsible of maternity were female. Majority (58.9%) of participants was in age’s category from 33-42, 61.6% have A1 education level and 53.4% have experience less than five years. Data quality index of one out of four (25%) MNH indicators was found below 95% accepted by WHO. The main reasons for insufiscient quality of data are lack of data validation meetings (57.5%) and incompleteness of reporting tools (36.4%). Monthly data validation meetings chaired by HC leaders are important to contribute to high-quality data in healthcare settings. Supportive supervisions done in data quality and management have to be organized in a supportive, and educative way.","PeriodicalId":93210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health international","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-22-4313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data quality is defined as a measure of data status that fulfills the following elements: accuracy, completeness, consistency, reliability, and if the data is current. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that only 40% of all countries have an adequate system to collect information on birth and deaths. Even though the system is there, vital registration systems are inaccurate and incomplete in developing countries. In Rwanda, maternal health related data was over-reported more than other indicators. These are the main reasons for conducting the study to investigate the data quality of four maternal and newborn health indicators reported by Rwandan Western Province health centers. This concurrent-mixed method study included 61 data managers and 12 key informants. Routine data quality assessment tool and structured interview guide were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used to get proportion of respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics. The analysis was done for assessing median of data quality index. The results show that 55.7% of data managers were male while 58.3% of responsible of maternity were female. Majority (58.9%) of participants was in age’s category from 33-42, 61.6% have A1 education level and 53.4% have experience less than five years. Data quality index of one out of four (25%) MNH indicators was found below 95% accepted by WHO. The main reasons for insufiscient quality of data are lack of data validation meetings (57.5%) and incompleteness of reporting tools (36.4%). Monthly data validation meetings chaired by HC leaders are important to contribute to high-quality data in healthcare settings. Supportive supervisions done in data quality and management have to be organized in a supportive, and educative way.
卢旺达西部省孕产妇和新生儿健康指标的质量
数据质量被定义为满足以下要素的数据状态的衡量标准:准确性、完整性、一致性、可靠性,以及数据是否是最新的。世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)报告说,只有40%的国家有足够的系统来收集出生和死亡信息。尽管有这一制度,但发展中国家的人口动态登记制度是不准确和不完整的。在卢旺达,与其他指标相比,与孕产妇健康相关的数据被高估了。这些是进行研究以调查卢旺达西部省卫生中心报告的四项孕产妇和新生儿健康指标的数据质量的主要原因。这项同时进行的混合方法研究包括61名数据管理员和12名关键信息员。使用常规数据质量评估工具和结构化访谈指南收集数据。描述性统计用于获得受访者社会人口特征的比例。进行分析是为了评估数据质量指数的中位数。结果显示,55.7%的数据管理者是男性,58.3%的产妇负责人是女性。大多数(58.9%)参与者属于33-42岁的年龄段,61.6%的参与者具有A1教育水平,53.4%的参与者经验不足五年。四分之一(25%)MNH指标的数据质量指数低于世界卫生组织接受的95%。数据质量不高的主要原因是缺乏数据验证会议(57.5%)和报告工具不完整(36.4%)。HC领导人主持的每月数据验证会议对于在医疗环境中提供高质量数据非常重要。数据质量和管理方面的支持性监督必须以支持性和教育性的方式组织起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信