Pre-Operative Temporal Bone CT Scan Readings and Intraoperative Findings During Mastoidectomy

Dominador Toral, Chris Robinson Laganao
{"title":"Pre-Operative Temporal Bone CT Scan Readings and Intraoperative Findings During Mastoidectomy","authors":"Dominador Toral, Chris Robinson Laganao","doi":"10.32412/pjohns.v36i2.1839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nObjective: To determine the correlation between pre-operative in-house temporal bone CT scan readings and intraoperative findings during mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma in a tertiary government hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. \nMethods: \nDesign: Review of Records \nSetting: Tertiary Government Hospital \nParticipants: A total of 25 charts were included in the study. Surgical memoranda containing intraoperative findings were scrutinized. Data on key structures or locations were filled into a data gathering tool. Categorical descriptions were used for surgical findings: “present” or “absent” for location, and “intact” or “eroded” for status of ossicles and critical structures. Radiological readings to describe location and extent of disease were recorded as either “involved” or “uninvolved,” while “intact” or “eroded” were used to describe the status of ossicles and critical structures identified. Statistical correlations were computed using Cohen kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were also computed. \n  \nResults: No correlation between radiologic readings and surgical findings were found in terms of location and extent of cholesteatoma (κ < 0). However, moderate agreement was noted in terms of status of the malleus (κ = .42, 95% CI, .059 to .781, p<.05), substantial agreement noted for the incus status (κ = 0.682, 95% CI, .267 to .875, p<.05), and fair agreement noted for the stapes status (κ = .303, 95% CI, -.036 to .642, p>.05). Slight agreement was also noted in description of facial canal and labyrinth (κ =.01, 95% CI, -.374 to .394, p>.05), while no correlation was noted for the status of the tegmen (κ = 0, 95% CI, -.392 to .392, p<.05). \nConclusion: Our study shows the unreliability and shortcomings of CT scan readings in our institution in detecting and predicting surgical findings. An institutional policy needs to be considered to ensure that temporal bone CT scans be obtained using techniques that can appropriately describe the status of the middle ear and adjacent structures with better reliability.","PeriodicalId":33358,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v36i2.1839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the correlation between pre-operative in-house temporal bone CT scan readings and intraoperative findings during mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma in a tertiary government hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. Methods: Design: Review of Records Setting: Tertiary Government Hospital Participants: A total of 25 charts were included in the study. Surgical memoranda containing intraoperative findings were scrutinized. Data on key structures or locations were filled into a data gathering tool. Categorical descriptions were used for surgical findings: “present” or “absent” for location, and “intact” or “eroded” for status of ossicles and critical structures. Radiological readings to describe location and extent of disease were recorded as either “involved” or “uninvolved,” while “intact” or “eroded” were used to describe the status of ossicles and critical structures identified. Statistical correlations were computed using Cohen kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were also computed.   Results: No correlation between radiologic readings and surgical findings were found in terms of location and extent of cholesteatoma (κ < 0). However, moderate agreement was noted in terms of status of the malleus (κ = .42, 95% CI, .059 to .781, p<.05), substantial agreement noted for the incus status (κ = 0.682, 95% CI, .267 to .875, p<.05), and fair agreement noted for the stapes status (κ = .303, 95% CI, -.036 to .642, p>.05). Slight agreement was also noted in description of facial canal and labyrinth (κ =.01, 95% CI, -.374 to .394, p>.05), while no correlation was noted for the status of the tegmen (κ = 0, 95% CI, -.392 to .392, p<.05). Conclusion: Our study shows the unreliability and shortcomings of CT scan readings in our institution in detecting and predicting surgical findings. An institutional policy needs to be considered to ensure that temporal bone CT scans be obtained using techniques that can appropriately describe the status of the middle ear and adjacent structures with better reliability.
乳突切除术前颞骨CT扫描读数及术中发现
目的:探讨2018年1月至2019年12月某三级政府医院胆脂瘤乳突切除术患者术前颞骨CT扫描与术中表现的相关性。方法:设计:病历设置回顾:三级政府医院:研究对象:共纳入25张图表。包括术中发现的手术备忘录被仔细审查。关键结构或位置的数据被填入数据收集工具。手术发现采用分类描述:定位“存在”或“缺失”,听骨和关键结构状态“完整”或“侵蚀”。描述疾病位置和程度的放射学读数记录为“受累”或“未受累”,而“完整”或“侵蚀”用于描述已确定的小骨和关键结构的状态。采用Cohen kappa系数计算统计相关性。敏感性、特异性和预测值也进行了计算。结果:在胆脂瘤的位置和范围方面,放射学读数与手术结果没有相关性(κ < 0)。然而,在内踝的状态方面,有中度的一致性(κ = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.059至0.781,p.05)。面部管和迷路的描述也略有一致(κ =)。01, 95% ci, -。374至0.394,p < 0.05),而被盖状态无相关性(κ = 0, 95% CI, - 0.05)。392 ~ 0.392, p< 0.05)。结论:我们的研究显示了我院CT扫描读数在发现和预测手术结果方面的不可靠性和不足。需要考虑一项制度政策,以确保使用能够更好地描述中耳和邻近结构状态的技术获得颞骨CT扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信