Big Decisions in Small Business Ecosystems: Stakeholder Priority

Annika Westrenius, Lisa Barnes
{"title":"Big Decisions in Small Business Ecosystems: Stakeholder Priority","authors":"Annika Westrenius, Lisa Barnes","doi":"10.13189/aeb.2020.080201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an increasingly competitive environment, engaging with stakeholders is no longer an option but a necessity to ensure short-term and long-term success. This is particularly true in small business, yet little is known about how small business managers make those decisions, often under uncertainty and time pressure. Small businesses operate in networks of interdependent entities (ecosystems) where individuals are known to each other. This supports building of relationships, trust and reputation and removes the separation between 'business' and 'ethics' by promoting a long-term focus. Yet, limited resources and conflicting demands result in a need to prioritise some stakeholder demands. As suggested by Stakeholder Salience, decision makers may prioritise stakeholder claims based on perceived levels of power, legitimacy and urgency. The key decision makers of nine Australian small businesses were asked about their relationships with important stakeholders, how decisions regarding the priority of various stakeholders and their expectations were made and what factors may affect such decisions. Relationships with stakeholders were identified as dynamic and strategic resources, interviewees invested considerable time and effort to build and maintain positive relationships. Consistent with Stakeholder Salience model, decisions were affected by perceptions of stakeholders' level of power, legitimacy and urgency. This research also found that intuitive perceptions about the stakeholder affected the decision-making process, and identified the following additional factors: commitment, dependence and potential exit costs as well as the decision maker's perception of alignment with own values, thereby introducing a moral and ethical consideration that would sometimes take priority over other considerations.","PeriodicalId":91438,"journal":{"name":"Advances in economics and business","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in economics and business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2020.080201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an increasingly competitive environment, engaging with stakeholders is no longer an option but a necessity to ensure short-term and long-term success. This is particularly true in small business, yet little is known about how small business managers make those decisions, often under uncertainty and time pressure. Small businesses operate in networks of interdependent entities (ecosystems) where individuals are known to each other. This supports building of relationships, trust and reputation and removes the separation between 'business' and 'ethics' by promoting a long-term focus. Yet, limited resources and conflicting demands result in a need to prioritise some stakeholder demands. As suggested by Stakeholder Salience, decision makers may prioritise stakeholder claims based on perceived levels of power, legitimacy and urgency. The key decision makers of nine Australian small businesses were asked about their relationships with important stakeholders, how decisions regarding the priority of various stakeholders and their expectations were made and what factors may affect such decisions. Relationships with stakeholders were identified as dynamic and strategic resources, interviewees invested considerable time and effort to build and maintain positive relationships. Consistent with Stakeholder Salience model, decisions were affected by perceptions of stakeholders' level of power, legitimacy and urgency. This research also found that intuitive perceptions about the stakeholder affected the decision-making process, and identified the following additional factors: commitment, dependence and potential exit costs as well as the decision maker's perception of alignment with own values, thereby introducing a moral and ethical consideration that would sometimes take priority over other considerations.
小企业生态系统中的重大决策:利益相关者优先
在竞争日益激烈的环境中,与利益相关者接触不再是一种选择,而是确保短期和长期成功的必要条件。这在小企业中尤其如此,但人们对小企业经理如何在不确定性和时间压力下做出这些决定知之甚少。小企业在相互依存的实体(生态系统)网络中运营,在这些实体中,个体相互了解。这有助于建立关系、信任和声誉,并通过促进长期关注消除“商业”和“道德”之间的分离。然而,有限的资源和相互冲突的需求导致需要优先考虑一些利益相关者的需求。正如利益相关者突出的建议,决策者可以根据感知的权力、合法性和紧迫性水平,优先考虑利益相关者的主张。九家澳大利亚小企业的主要决策者被问及他们与重要利益相关者的关系,如何就各种利益相关者及其期望的优先事项做出决定,以及哪些因素可能影响这些决定。与利益相关者的关系被确定为动态和战略性资源,受访者投入了大量时间和精力来建立和保持积极的关系。与利益相关者显著性模型一致,决策受到利益相关者权力水平、合法性和紧迫性的影响。这项研究还发现,对利益相关者的直观看法影响了决策过程,并确定了以下额外因素:承诺、依赖和潜在的退出成本,以及决策者对与自身价值观一致的看法,从而引入了道德和伦理考虑,有时会优先于其他考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信