Geometry: The Third Book of Foundations

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Michalis Sialaros
{"title":"Geometry: The Third Book of Foundations","authors":"Michalis Sialaros","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2019.1615667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"one of his other books. This is unfortunate as it is exactly this philosophy of language that is supposed to get rid of the myth of information as a natural object. Thus, we are in principle being asked to accept a solution based on a language-philosophical foundation that we cannot properly evaluate. That is ironic in a philosophical analysis of the consequences of tacit (and misguided) philosophical foundations. However, the brilliance of What Is Information? lies in Janich’s endeavour to reconceptualise information as a cultural construct. For Janich, the ultimate mistake in philosophy of science is the decoupling of information and culture. The theorisation of information as a natural object decouples information from the cultural practice of communication that is information’s actual origin. As Janich puts it,","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":"32 1","pages":"75 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02698595.2019.1615667","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2019.1615667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

one of his other books. This is unfortunate as it is exactly this philosophy of language that is supposed to get rid of the myth of information as a natural object. Thus, we are in principle being asked to accept a solution based on a language-philosophical foundation that we cannot properly evaluate. That is ironic in a philosophical analysis of the consequences of tacit (and misguided) philosophical foundations. However, the brilliance of What Is Information? lies in Janich’s endeavour to reconceptualise information as a cultural construct. For Janich, the ultimate mistake in philosophy of science is the decoupling of information and culture. The theorisation of information as a natural object decouples information from the cultural practice of communication that is information’s actual origin. As Janich puts it,
几何学:基础第三卷
他的另一本书。这是不幸的,因为正是这种语言哲学应该摆脱信息作为自然对象的神话。因此,原则上,我们被要求接受一个基于我们无法正确评估的语言哲学基础的解决方案。在对隐性(和误导性)哲学基础后果的哲学分析中,这是具有讽刺意味的。然而,什么是信息?在于Janich努力将信息重新定义为一种文化建构。对Janich来说,科学哲学的终极错误是信息与文化的脱钩。信息作为自然对象的理论化使信息与作为信息实际来源的文化交流实践脱钩。正如Janich所说,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science is a scholarly journal dedicated to publishing original research in philosophy of science and in philosophically informed history and sociology of science. Its scope includes the foundations and methodology of the natural, social, and human sciences, philosophical implications of particular scientific theories, and broader philosophical reflection on science. The editors invite contributions not only from philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, but also from researchers in the sciences. The journal publishes articles from a wide variety of countries and philosophical traditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信