Comparing uncertainties—Are they really different?

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Peter D. Rostron, Tom Fearn, Michael H. Ramsey
{"title":"Comparing uncertainties—Are they really different?","authors":"Peter D. Rostron,&nbsp;Tom Fearn,&nbsp;Michael H. Ramsey","doi":"10.1007/s00769-022-01501-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Uncertainties occur at all stages of a measurement process. Quantification of these uncertainties is important in order to make reliable decisions based on these measurement results. In some cases it can be useful to be able to compare the uncertainties associated with different measurement methods, in order to establish the method that is most reliable. A comparison can also be made between uncertainties that have themselves been evaluated using different estimation procedures. This paper discusses the comparison of uncertainties in chemical measurements using case study examples. Depending on the context, both exact and approximate <i>F</i>-tests are used to compare the ratios of uncertainties, while in some cases the approach is to compare separate confidence intervals.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"27 3","pages":"133 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-022-01501-2.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-022-01501-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Uncertainties occur at all stages of a measurement process. Quantification of these uncertainties is important in order to make reliable decisions based on these measurement results. In some cases it can be useful to be able to compare the uncertainties associated with different measurement methods, in order to establish the method that is most reliable. A comparison can also be made between uncertainties that have themselves been evaluated using different estimation procedures. This paper discusses the comparison of uncertainties in chemical measurements using case study examples. Depending on the context, both exact and approximate F-tests are used to compare the ratios of uncertainties, while in some cases the approach is to compare separate confidence intervals.

Abstract Image

比较不确定性——它们真的不同吗?
不确定度发生在测量过程的所有阶段。为了根据这些测量结果做出可靠的决策,对这些不确定性进行量化是很重要的。在某些情况下,能够比较与不同测量方法有关的不确定度是有用的,以便确定最可靠的方法。也可以对使用不同估计程序评估的不确定性本身进行比较。本文用实例讨论了化学测量中不确定度的比较。根据具体情况,精确f检验和近似f检验都用于比较不确定性的比率,而在某些情况下,方法是比较单独的置信区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信